Gear Change review |Part II

PDP_Gear Change II Cycling Vision

A bold vision for cycling and walking

In July 2020, the government released their visionary plan ‘Gear Change – A bold vision for cycling and walking’. A clear message emerges from this new government scheme: they plan to enable the general public to switch commuting traffic jams for swift journeys by foot, wheel and public transport.

From an urban planning perspective, I am very glad to see a holistic approach to transportation where road design is not just driven by cars, but by public transport, cycling and walking for everyone from 8 to 80, everyone.

Walking and cycling in our towns is key and should be considered universal and travelling on two wheels become as ubiquitous as the private car. These new networks will also provide a framework for non-standard bicycles, mobility cycles, cargo bikes and more- that’s your Uber delivery, or parcel coming your way on two or three wheels!

As part of the UK decarbonization plan, the current way of deliveries, particularly to city centres, will be re-structured and perhaps a combination of deliveries done by smaller vehicles, including cargo bikes (which can transport up to 250kg) might be an alternative to heavy vehicles and congested city centres.

The new infrastructure should be a connected network that facilitates links to other areas of town and city. Only by allowing this, will we be able to consider leaving our cars behind. But not only that, it is also very promising to see that alongside this infrastructure, the plan is to also provide appropriate cycle parking in each area: city centres, apartment blocks and train stations, such as is the norm in Amsterdam, or closer to home Cambridge’s train station.

It is the intention that new developments, whether residential or business, be built around sustainable travel and promote cycling and walking as the first choice for journeys. Special attention will be given at planning level to make sure that this is included from early stages. For example through the revision of The Manual for Streets Design and The National Model Design Guide.

It is a very ambitious plan that the government is proposing, and who knows what it might achieve? But to use an example, Amsterdam is the epitome of urban cycling in Europe today, and it’s hard to imagine that the city- and Holland in general- was once dominated by the car, and that not until the 1960’s a mass public movement facilitated the change, so let’s hope that with some luck we will be able to enjoy better built environments very soon.

Fernando Collado Lopez, Architect, Planning & Design Practice Ltd

Cycling networks in cities | Seville as a case study

PDP_Cycling Seville

During my years studying Architecture and urban planning in Seville, I witnessed the radical changes that a new cycling network brought to the city. Following the recent government initiative to boost cycling in the UK, I would like to share some of the outcomes of the Seville cycling network.

Cycling network | Seville

  • 180km (112 miles)of bike paths created around the city at a cost of €35,000,000 or €194,000 per km.
  • Bike use prior to 2003 was 0.6% of all trips made, by 2011 this increased to 9% (a 15-fold increase).
  • Daily bike trips across the city reached 72,500 by 2011 (Seville has a municipal population of 700,000 people and a well-developed public transport network with underground, trams and buses).

UK government | May 2020

“Far more people will be cycling and walking thanks to plans to boost greener, active transport, launched today in May 2020 by Transport Secretary Grant Shapps.

In May government pop-up bikes lanes with protected space for cycling, wider pavements, safer junctions, and cycle and bus-only corridors will be created in England as part of a £250 million emergency active travel fund – the first stage of a £2 billion investment, as part of the £5 billion in new funding announced for cycling and buses in February. Following unprecedented levels of walking and cycling across the UK during the pandemic, the plans will help encourage more people to choose alternatives to public transport when they need to travel, making healthier habits easier and helping make sure the road, bus and rail networks are ready to respond to future increases in demand.”

This incentive should also mean that not only public transport trips are reduced, but also private transport trips. If we use the Seville case as an example, a whopping 72,500 potential daily car journeys were avoided, which seems a very positive outcome.

The weather factor is also something to consider, with Seville obviously boasting a far warmer climate than the UK, but seeing how commuters in cities like London ride their bikes in all weathers this should give us some reassurance that this is possible across the UK.

I have begun to ride to work recently and, apart from the added health benefits, I was very surprised to see that door to door my journey can be less time consuming than using the bus service (which at rush hour can turn a 20 minute journey into 45 minutes). In addition, the cost to the commuter is less when cycling, or even when taking your bike onto the train for part of the journey (£5/day for a return ticket compared with £7/day on the bus). Whilst riding my bike has, of course, been free and has taken me around 40 minutes for a lovely 8 mile bike ride through the Derbyshire hills between Belper and Derby.

It will be interesting to see whether some of the government’s £2 billion investment can be applied to key commuter routes within Derby and to and from its surrounding settlements.

Fernando Collado Lopez, MArch (Seville) ARB, Architect, Planning & Design Practice Ltd

Main Image: Seville Traveller

GET IN TOUCH