Biodiversity Net Gain Becomes Mandatory

Biodiversity

Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG) became become mandatory in February 2024 for all developments, with some minor exceptions. Whilst BNG can have benefits for us and the nature around us, it can impact your projects negatively. So, what does BNG mean for applicants, landowners, and homeowners?

Biodiversity Net Gain can impact the size of any potential developments, considering considering the now legal requirement to maintain habitats and reverse a loss of biodiversity. One of the key features of BNG is the statutory target to increase the biodiversity value of a site by 10% for a minimum of 30 years, through a habitat management and monitoring plan. The impacts of BNG on your developments can also mean they are less viable, so all aspects need to be considered as your project progresses.

Read on to learn more about biodiversity net gain and how if impacts planning and architecture.

What Is Biodiversity Net Gain?

An approach to development, biodiversity net gain aims to make sure that habitats for wildlife are left in a measurably better state than they were before the development took place. One of the new mandatory features of BNG is the target to increase the biodiversity of a site by 10%. This is required for a minimum of 30 years and is done through habitat management and monitoring plans. The law was expected to come into effect in November 2023, but was delayed. From February 2024, large sites were expected to comply, followed by small sites from 2nd April 2024.

It’s still early days so there has yet to be sufficient evidence of this law’s effectiveness at reversing the loss of biodiversity. There is also worry about how biodiversity net gain will work in practice. However, it’s now law and can’t be ignored by either planning applicants or local authorities.

How Does Biodiversity Net Gain Work?

In England, BNG is founded on the ‘mitigation hierarchy’, as detailed in the National Planning Policy Framework. This hierarchy presents a step-by-step approach to addressing the harm that might be caused to biodiversity when determining planning applications.

As shown below, the idea of avoidance is prioritised. This is then followed by the use of mitigation measures to minimise the application’s impact on biodiversity. If BNG can be achieved on-site, it should be. The final step, off-site compensation or ‘offsetting’, should be considered a last resort in the biodiversity net gain process.

Mitigation hierarchy diagram. Source: Buro Happold
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Linkdin
Share on Pinterest

GET IN TOUCH