The new Planning Act – Will it see the light of day?

PDP_New Planning Act

The Planning White Paper, published in August 2020, promised the biggest shake-up of the planning system since the Second World War. However, there has been a re-think following the Tories’ Amersham and Chesham by-election defeat where planning dominated the campaign, with the electorate concerned that the proposed changes would make the planning system less democratic with less opportunities for communities to participate. Jonathan Jenkin, Consultant at Planning & Design Practice takes a look at what might be in store for the Act in 2022.

There is a section within the Conservative party who loathe the planning system on ideological grounds. It is seen as one of the last bastions of socialism one that should be scrapped to allow the market in land and property to be unfettered with development rights returned to landowners.

There is another section within the Conservative party who use the planning system to protect their often-privileged way of life. Those who have paid to live in the Green belt, in conservation areas, the coast, AONBs, National Parks etc and whose property prices reflect the constraints on development in those areas. There are also those who value tradition, the way areas look, protecting old buildings and the quality of the man made townscape and landscape of town and countryside. Whether it is protecting privilege or a way of life, anti-development protest has become a middle-class activity.

The planning system has been starved of resources in the last 10 years. The system has lost expertise, few councils have conservation officers, Development Control is often poorly paid and many of the best planners now work for the private sector. Enforcement is also laxer, undermining the faith people have in the system and its fairness. This lack of resources both at local level and nationally through the appeal process has slowed the system down. In wealthy areas councillors have become more anti-development to reflect the wishes of their constituents. This leads to planning officer’s recommendations being turned down and pressure on the appeal system. This has led to calls to simplify and speed up the system. Changes to the General Permitted Development Order have become labyrinthine and have reduced the scope of the planning system to control change particularly in urban areas. This has conversely increased the anxiety of those seeking to prevent development from allowing schemes fearing future changes that cannot be controlled.

The whole system is a mess, and the first thing is that it needs proper resourcing using public money. Michael Gove is now the minister responsible; few would mourn the loss of Robert Jenrick. Michael has said that public money for public goods , but can he do this for planning?

The second is a review of the GPDO, to make it sensible.

The third is a new white paper that seeks to create a proper system of local, regional, and national plans which provide direction and purpose helping to ensure that national infrastructure and climate change goals can be delivered with levelling up through a proper appraisal of the needs of the country.

The Planning White paper of 2020 (Planning for the Future) sought to further reduce the role of planning in public life. It sought to divide and rule with areas for growth, development, and protection. It tried to give protection to the wealthy and privileged while removing controls in poorer areas as a way of meeting the ideological divide at the heart of the party. The white paper was not about what is good for the country, or the well-being of its people and it should have been.

The white paper bit the dust following the Amersham and Chesham by election. A safe conservative seat to the liberal democrats who used the fear of the loss of a functioning planning system to win the seat. In the conservative heartlands, planning matters and I hope that the new white paper will look at the national picture in England to deliver for all the people in the country a national system that is equitable to all.

The new white paper is promised sometime this year. Let’s see….

Jonathan Jenkin, Consultant, Planning & Design Practice Ltd

Future Homes Standard 2020

PDP_Future Homes Standard

Just over a year ago, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concluded that we need to reach net zero greenhouse gas emissions globally by 2050. Although the IPCC didn’t focus on individual countries, the ‘impacts, vulnerability and adaptation’ report did identify three key risks from climate change for Europe:

  • The increased economic losses and more people affected by flooding in river basins and coasts, as urbanisation continues, sea levels rise and peak river flows increase;
  • Increased water restrictions. Significant reduction in water availability from river abstraction and from groundwater resources combined with increased water demand (e.g. for irrigation, energy and industry and domestic use);
  • Increased economic losses and people affected by extreme heat events: impacts on health and well-being, labour productivity, crop production and air quality.

The UK could also be impacted by global issues such as rising food prices. High levels of adaptation could significantly reduce but not remove these risks. In the UK, the built environment currently generates around 25% of domestic greenhouse gas emissions with the construction sector representing 40% of the UK’s total carbon footprint.

In light of this, the government has prepared the Future Homes Standard 2020 consultation. This is the first stage of a two-part consultation about proposed changes to building regulations. It also covers the wider impacts of Part L (Conservation of fuel and power) for new homes, including changes to Part F (Ventilation), its associated Approved Document guidance, air tightness and improving ‘as built’ performance of the constructed home. The introduction of an uplift to Part L standards in 2020 would not only improve the energy efficiency of new homes but would also mean that home builders, installers and supply chains will be working to higher specifications in readiness for the introduction for a further uplift in 2025 to meet the Future Homes Standard. These changes for example will affect heating systems, building fabric (walls 17% improved, roofs 15 %, floors 15% improved, windows 43% improved) etc. which will outperform perform those built under current building standards.

When considering electric heating and heat pumps vs gas boilers, looking to the future, the benefit of electric systems at reducing regulated emissions becomes ever more apparent. Using the projected carbon factor for electricity in 2050 provided by BEIS (Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy), the government heat pump strategy anticipates to demonstrate 96% fewer emissions than a gas boiler strategy, which it is anticipated would be banned in new homes from 2025 onwards.

The consultation recognises that installation of heat pumps in the UK is at a level much lower than that necessary to meet the ambition of the Future Homes Standard and there is a need to establish heat pumps as a mass market solution for low carbon heating. District energy networks are referenced as an important solution for higher density areas such as cities, demonstrating the ability to incorporate novel, low carbon solutions with limited impact on the consumer, as well as the ability to exploit renewable or waste sources of energy. Direct electric heating could also have a role to play in heating homes of the future where heat demand is particularly low, for instance where a home is built to very high fabric standards, such as passivhaus. Homes heated by direct electric will need to consider strategies to limit exposure to high electricity costs.
Other technologies, such as hydrogen, could have a potential role to play, but heat pumps, heat networks and, are anticipated to be the primary means of delivering low carbon heat in future.

To conclude, if the proposed changes mean delivering resilient developments, better performing buildings, reducing emissions and the dependence fossil fuels, we might be paving the road for a better future.

The only question perhaps is, if heating our homes with electricity, and let’s assume that this is clean green electricity, would only prove to be a good alternative to gas and fossil fuels, if it is also affordable.

Fernando Collado Lopez, Architect, Planning & Design Practice Ltd

Briefing note: New permitted development rights and changes to the Use Classes Order

PDP_New Permitted Development Rights

July and August are proving to be a time of significant change for the English Planning system which has arrived on the back of changes announced at the start of the summer in response to the Covid-19 crisis. The introduction of new permitted development rights, changes to the Use Classes Order and a White Paper citing intentions to reform the decision-making process across the country have all been released within a period of a single fortnight.

This paper will look at new permitted development rights that have emerged as well as the changes to the Use Classes Order.

New Permitted Development Rights – A Summary

The changes relate to;

  • Demolition and Rebuild for Residential Use
  • Additional Storeys to Dwellinghouses
  • Additional Storeys to Create Dwellings
  • Changes to the Use Classes Order

The changes to Use Classes order provide greater flexibility for changes in uses without the need for planning permission. From the 1 September 2020 a new use Class E comes into effect which encompasses Class A1 – shops; financial and professional services; restaurants and cafes; and business. It also creates two new Use Classes, Class F1 is for learning and non-residential institutions. Specifically, any use not including residential use and Class F2 is for local community use.

The new permitted development rights represent exciting opportunities to business and homeowners alike. The opportunity for detached offices or light industrial units to be demolished and rebuilt with an apartment block that provides an additional two storeys will clearly be attractive in certain situations. Firstly the PD right provides certainty that the concept of such development is acceptable but the additional 2 floors is also likely to make schemes viable that previously weren’t.

It represents a great opportunity for small, rural commercial sites, for instance where there is a small 2 storey workshop as this could now be demolished and replaced with a 3 /4 storey home.

For the householder PD rights, the ability to provide a new storey opens up a great alternative to Dormer windows and loft conversions. The legislation has provision for the associated engineering operations and specifically cites foundations and wall strengthening as being allowed.

The right allows for the introduction of an additional story to give living accommodation providing a very large home. But perhaps the biggest advantage of the permitted development rights is for development in the Green Belt. Historically development in the Green Belt has to be limited to modest residential extensions, this right opens up some potentially enormous additions to an existing building that would normally be resisted by Local Authorities on the grounds of the harm that they would have on the openness of the Green Belt. This is a test that does not apply to permitted envelopment rights.

Use Classes Order (UCO)

The Government has announced fundamental changes to Town Centre Use Classes, which will provide greater flexibility for changes in uses without the need for planning permission.

From the 1 September 2020 a new use Class E will replace the following existing use classes:

  • Class A1 – shops;
  • Class A2 – financial and professional services;
  • Class A3 – restaurants and cafes; and
  • Class B1 – business.

This will mean that land or buildings utilised for the above uses will not need to obtain planning permission for changes within this use class.

There will also be a new Class F1 and F2, which will provide for change of use within each class.

Class F1 is for learning and non-residential institutions. Specifically, any use not including residential use:

(a) for the provision of education;
(b) for the display of works of art (otherwise than for sale or hire),
(c) as a museum,
(d) as a public library or public reading room,
(e) as a public hall or exhibition hall,
(f) for, or in connection with, public worship or religious instruction,
(g) as a law court.

Class F2 is for local community use. Specifically, any use as:

(a) a shop mostly selling essential goods, including food, to visiting members of the public in circumstances where—
(i) the shop’s premises cover an area not more than 280 metres square, and
(ii) there is no other such facility within 1000 metre radius of the shop’s location,
(b) a hall or meeting place for the principal use of the local community,
(c) an area or place for outdoor sport or recreation, not involving motorised vehicles or firearms,
(d) an indoor or outdoor swimming pool or skating rink.

Cinemas, concert halls pubs, wine bars and takeaways will become a sui generis use with no permitted changes.

Changes to the General Permitted Development Order

There are several new permitted development rights that have emerged, all of which relate to building upwards.

  • Demolition and Rebuild for Residential Use
  • Additional Storeys to Dwellinghouses
  • Additional Storeys to Create Dwellings

Demolition and Rebuild for Residential Use

Demolition of vacant and redundant free-standing buildings that fell within use class B1 and C3 on 12 March 2020, and their replacement with residential development. The rights apply to purpose-built residential blocks of flats only, and therefore do not apply to terraced buildings, detached dwellings or mixed-use buildings.

The rights only apply to buildings constructed prior to 1 January 1990 that have been entirely vacant for at least 6 months prior to the application for prior approval. The development, consisting of both demolition and replacement build, must be completed within three years of the date of the grant of prior approval.

There are various limits placed on the scale of the development permitted, including that it must be within the footprint of the original building with a footprint of up to 1,000 m2 and with a maximum height of 18m. This is subject to prior approval application in relation to the following criteria;

  • transport and highway impacts of the development,
  • contamination,
  • flooding risks,
  • impact of noise from other premises on the future residents,
  • design and external appearance of the new building,
  • adequacy of natural light in all habitable rooms of each new dwelling,
  • impact of the introduction of residential use into an area,
  • impact of the development on the amenity of the new building and of neighbouring premises,
  • impacts of noise from commercial premises,
  • impact on surrounding businesses, impact on heritage and archaeology,
  • method of demolition,
  • plans for landscaping and the impact on air traffic and defence.

The rights will not apply in Conservation Areas or to listed buildings or scheduled monuments.

Additional Storeys to Dwellinghouses

The new permitted development rights to allow existing houses to be extended by way of an additional 2 storeys. The rights apply to existing houses which are detached, semi-detached or in a terrace. They are subject to a maximum height limit of 18m, and where the house is in a terrace its height cannot be more than 3.5m higher than the next tallest house in the terrace.

The rights only apply to houses built between 1 July 1948 and 28 October 2018 and do not apply in Conservation Areas.

There is a requirement to obtain prior approval in relation to;

  • impact on the amenity of neighbouring premises,
  • external appearance,
  • impacts a taller building may have on air traffic and defence assets.

Additional Storeys to Create Dwellings

From 1 September the construction of up to 2 additional storeys on free standing blocks and on buildings in a terrace that are in certain commercial uses (including A1, A2, A3 and B1(a)), and in mixed uses with an element of housing, to create additional self-contained homes. The rights are subject to a maximum height limit of 30m for detached buildings and 18m for terraces.

A new Class AC and AD to Part 20 to the General Permitted Development Order will allow up to 2 additional storeys to be constructed on existing houses which are detached or in a terrace to create new self-contained homes. The rights are subject to a maximum height limit for the newly extended building of 18m and it cannot be more than 3.5m higher than the next tallest house in the terrace.

These rights apply to houses and buildings built between 1 July 1948 and 5 March 2018 and they have to have been in one of the relevant uses or mixed uses on 5 March 2018. The rights will not apply in Conservation Areas or to listed buildings or scheduled monuments.

There is a requirement to obtain prior approval in relation to the following;

  • transport and highway impacts of the development,
  • contamination and
  • flooding risks,
  • external appearance,
  • impact on amenity,
  • provision of adequate natural light in all habitable rooms of the new homes,
  • noise impact from existing commercial uses,
  • impact on surrounding businesses
  • impact on air traffic and defence assets.

Comprising town planners, architects and architectural assistants our staff bring a wealth of experience from a range of backgrounds and various parts of the UK. Our planners have worked in the public & private sectors, and have excellent working relations with Local Planning Authorities.

For further information and clarification on these new permitted development rights, and changes to the Use Classes Order please don’t hesitate to contact us for a no obligation consultation to discuss your project.

Planning for the future

Planning for the Future

On the 12th March the government published a policy paper ‘Planning for the Future’ which sets out its plans for housing and planning following announcements in the 2020 Budget.

The paper starts with a reaffirmation of its support for home ownership and its commitment to re-building a home owning Britain. It also promises that young people and future generations will have the same opportunities as those who came before them.

The Government set out its plan for four publications:

  1. A new White Paper on planning reform
  2. A building safety bill
  3. A renter’s reform bill
  4. A social housing white paper

The government acknowledge that it does have a role to ensure security of tenure for those who do not own their own homes and the need to prevent homelessness and build more affordable homes. A social housing white paper will look at social housing and the needs of tenants while the building safety bill will ensure tighter building control and possibly reforms of the system to prevent a repeat of Grenfell.

The government wants to promote more development where it is needed. New proposals include:

  • Encouraging increased densities in urban areas
  • £400m for brownfield regeneration
  • Creation of a national brownfield map and a call to build above railway stations
  • Changing the formula to calculate local housing need in and around urban areas to deliver 300,000 new homes
  • New permitted development rights to build upwards on existing buildings by the summer of 2020
  • Consultation on new permitted development rights to allow demolition of existing vacant commercial, industrial and residential buildings and their replacement with well- designed new residential units
  • Support for self-build and community construction
  • Support for the Oxford Cambridge Arc including a new spatial development framework and up to 4 new development corporations

The government wants to ensure that sufficient land is available to deliver homes where they are needed:

  • All LPAs to have an up to date Local Plan in place by December 2023
  • Raising the housing delivery test to 75% in November 2020
  • Reforming the New Homes Bonus

The government pledge a commitment to ‘infrastructure first’

  • Investing in infrastructure to unlock up to 70,000 new homes
  • Creating a new £10bn single Housing Infrastructure Fund

The government want to speed up the Planning system by:-

  • Maximising the potential of new technologies
  • Reforming planning fees to ensure that planning authorities are properly resourced.
  • Rebates where planning applications are successful on appeal
  • The government will act to make it clearer who owns land to encourage the build out of sites
  • Expanding the use of Local Development Orders to simplify granting of planning permission in selected areas.
  • Improving the effectiveness of Compulsory Purchase Orders to aid land assembly and infrastructure delivery

The government wants to help first time buyers by:

  • The ‘First Homes Scheme’ will lower the cost of many new homes by a third and the discount will be locked into the property in perpetuity
  • Help to create fixed rate long term mortgages
  • Creation of a new national shared ownership model

The Government also wants to build better, more beautiful places by:

  • Revisions to the NPPF to embed the principles of good design and place making
  • Respond to the Building Better, Building Beautiful commissions report
  • Using the National Model Design Code to promote the production of local design codes and guides.
  • Review the policies regarding building in flood zones
  • Introduction of a Future Homes standard reducing carbon emissions from new homes by 80%
  • Establishing a net zero development around Toton between Derby and Nottingham.

This list of proposals is ambitious but there is no mention of regional or strategic planning which has the potential to direct development to where it is really needed. However the ambition is to be welcomed, but some of the proposals such as building upwards run counter to improved building safety, heritage restrictions and other constraints and may be limited to very specific locations.

Jonathan Jenkin, Managing Director, Planning & Design Practice Ltd

GET IN TOUCH