Fore! Planning permission rides on Ryder success

PDP_Ryder Cup Hulton Park

The Secretary of State (SoS) has granted planning permission for a major development within the Manchester green belt consisting of a golf resort, 1,036 homes and heritage restoration works at Hulton Park to the southwest of Bolton. However, the development can only go ahead if the site is successful in its bid to host golf’s Ryder Cup in either 2031 or 2035.

In granting planning permission, the SoS concluded that whilst the proposal did not comply with the development plan, the contribution to meeting the council’s housing land supply shortage and the very substantial economic and social benefits of the golf resort proposal (with estimates for jobs created and Gross Value Added generated being 1686 jobs and £1.1 billion (GVA) respectively). The secretary of state saw this as particularly significant in an area with high levels of deprivation and economic inactivity. He also held that the project represented the optimum viable use for the historic park in which it was proposed, in accordance with Planning Practice Guidance. It was concluded that very special circumstances which outweigh the harm to the Green Belt exist, so as to justify the grant of planning permission – but they will only exist if the Ryder Cup is held at the site.

Richard Pigott, Director at Planning & Design Practice, said: “This is a highly unusual decision given that it is by no means certain that the venue will ever win the right to host the Ryder Cup. The biennial golf competition, which pits the best American and European golfers against each other, only takes place at a European venue every four years. Much like the Olympics, it is a much sought-after event and may well go to a country in continental Europe in 2031 given that the 2027 event will be held in Ireland. Furthermore, it is not yet clear when a decision will be made about the 2031 and 2035 host venues but we will be sure to let you know when there is further news.”

If your property is located within the Green Belt and you propose something which is deemed to be ‘inappropriate development’, it will be necessary to demonstrate Very Special Circumstances (VSC). However, VSC need not be a single wholly exceptional reason such as the hosting of a major sporting event. VSC can include existing permitted development rights, a high-quality design, public benefits, energy from renewable sources and any number of other valid considerations. It’s important to remember that a collection of factors together, while not ‘special’ on their own, can combine to constitute very special circumstances.

As a practice we are highly experienced in submitting planning applications in Green Belt locations. If you have a property located in the Green Belt and would like some advice, please get in touch.

Class Q appeal in Staffordshire Moorlands establishes that modern agricultural building conversion is acceptable

PDP_Class Q Appeal

Planning & Design Practice have recently won an appeal against refusal of Prior Approval by Staffordshire Moorlands District Council, in relation to a barn conversion under Class Q of Permitted Development.

This permission was hard won, involving 2 applications for prior approval and several re-designs of the scheme, along with the appeal against the second refusal, as well as providing comments in relation to the updated NPPF (July 2018) during the appeal process. Several members of the team were involved in the whole project, eventually achieving the result our clients were after by gaining approval from the Secretary of State’s appointed Inspector.

The Council has a reputation for strongly resisting applications under Class Q, when the building in question is of modern construction, as opposed to more historical barns that are built from brick or stone. However the permitted development legislation makes no distinction in this respect.

Indeed, it could be argued that Class Q has been enacted to facilitate the conversion of modern agricultural buildings, given that a normal planning permission for change of use is still an available route for applicants with traditional buildings.

Key points from the Inspector’s report that found favour with our arguments and evidence included; that the building is structurally capable of conversion; that none of the proposed works would fall outside of those building operations permitted, that they would be reasonably necessary for the building to function as a dwelling; and that the replacement of the roof materials, provided they are not structural elements, would fall within the scope of works permissible.

Other more general comments of note by the Inspector include:

“The nature of agricultural buildings will invariably mean that they will not have all of the necessary elements of a residential dwelling, or have them to the necessary standard or condition, hence the provisions of paragraph Q.1.(i).”

On the matter of the number of windows in the proposed scheme:

“I do not share the Council’s view that the number of windows proposed is excessive or unnecessary.”

In relation to the Council’s criticism of a ‘domestic’ appearance of the scheme:

“The very nature of a change from an agricultural building to a dwelling will invariably introduce a more domestic appearance in the form of windows and doors.”

In response to the Council’s criticism of full height windows:

“The full height form of the windows would not be uncharacteristic in my view, given the size of openings commonly found on agricultural buildings.”

The most interesting comment from the Inspector however, in my opinion, draws a line once and for all under Staffordshire Moorlands District Council’s “resistance in principle” to the conversion of modern agricultural buildings:

“…the permitted development right under Class Q, which as its starting point, grants permission for agricultural buildings to be converted to dwellings, andit must therefore be the government’s intention that, in principle, such buildings can remain in the landscape and serve a new function as dwellings.”

This appeal decision sets a clear precedent for the acceptability of conversion of modern agricultural buildings under permitted development, and there are many sections of this appeal decision that we will refer to in future. It is hoped that the Planning Officers at SMDC will take on board the Inspector’s reasoning and take a more pragmatic view of these types of applications in future.

If you are considering a barn conversion under Permitted Development Class Q or are currently experiencing difficulties with, or a refusal of, a submitted application, please get in touch with us at Planning & Design Practice for advice on 01332 347371 or email enquiries@planningdesign.co.uk.

Class Q Appeal

GET IN TOUCH