Redundant farm building remade as affordable home

Farm Building Class Q

Planning & Design Practice is pleased to have secured another consent to convert a farm building to a home under Class Q in the Staffordshire Moorlands, writes Director and Chartered Town Planner Richard Pigott.

The modest agricultural building, located off Heath House Lane near Checkley, is enclosed on three sides but open at the front. The council’s officers recommended refusal on 3 grounds but it was overturned by committee members. The first two concerns, relating to impact on heritage assets and impact on the external appearance of the barn, were not shared by members, who had visited the site earlier that day. The third reason for refusal stated that the external dimensions of the building would extend beyond the existing external dimensions. This related to the proposed enclosure of small sections of external cladding beneath the building’s canopy. We pointed out, however, that Article 2(1) of the General Permitted Development Order 2015 provides that, for the purposes of the GPDO, ‘floor space’ means the total floor space in a ‘building’. It defines building as including any structure and erection, including any part of a building. The area beneath the canopy is under the roof and so in and part of the building, not outside of it. We therefore successfully argued that the enclosure of a small area of side cladding (in addition to the enclosure of the open front of the building) would not extend the building beyond the existing external dimensions.

The approval will mean the re-use of a redundant farm building and provide a modest and relatively affordable home in an area where there is a shortage of this type of house. It will not adversely affect any neighbouring properties, it has a safe access and will assist the council in meeting its housing needs. We look forward to seeing the barn converted in the near future.

Barn Conversion have been with us for many years and have gained in popularity since the 1990’s. There are now many examples of these unique, homes up and down the country, each with its own character. Working with either a ‘modern’ or traditional farm building can both yield spectacular results when approached in the right way. The key is to work with the building and its context to produce something that is unique to that particular site.

In the world of planning there are two ways to obtain permission to convert a farm building to a house. One is through the submission of a full planning application to your Local Planning Authority. The second is through exercising permitted development rights, commonly referred to as Class Q, which involves submitting a Prior Approval application to your Local Planning Authority.

Class Q is complex, and subject to a variety of conditions and restrictions. We have lots of experience in this area, and can provide you with expert advice on issues to be taken into account prior to submission of your application through to receiving the decision.

For more information, or to discuss how we could help with a specific project or property please don’t hesitate to get in touch on 01332 347371.

Class Q appeal in Staffordshire Moorlands establishes that modern agricultural building conversion is acceptable

PDP_Class Q Appeal

Planning & Design Practice have recently won an appeal against refusal of Prior Approval by Staffordshire Moorlands District Council, in relation to a barn conversion under Class Q of Permitted Development.

This permission was hard won, involving 2 applications for prior approval and several re-designs of the scheme, along with the appeal against the second refusal, as well as providing comments in relation to the updated NPPF (July 2018) during the appeal process. Several members of the team were involved in the whole project, eventually achieving the result our clients were after by gaining approval from the Secretary of State’s appointed Inspector.

The Council has a reputation for strongly resisting applications under Class Q, when the building in question is of modern construction, as opposed to more historical barns that are built from brick or stone. However the permitted development legislation makes no distinction in this respect.

Indeed, it could be argued that Class Q has been enacted to facilitate the conversion of modern agricultural buildings, given that a normal planning permission for change of use is still an available route for applicants with traditional buildings.

Key points from the Inspector’s report that found favour with our arguments and evidence included; that the building is structurally capable of conversion; that none of the proposed works would fall outside of those building operations permitted, that they would be reasonably necessary for the building to function as a dwelling; and that the replacement of the roof materials, provided they are not structural elements, would fall within the scope of works permissible.

Other more general comments of note by the Inspector include:

“The nature of agricultural buildings will invariably mean that they will not have all of the necessary elements of a residential dwelling, or have them to the necessary standard or condition, hence the provisions of paragraph Q.1.(i).”

On the matter of the number of windows in the proposed scheme:

“I do not share the Council’s view that the number of windows proposed is excessive or unnecessary.”

In relation to the Council’s criticism of a ‘domestic’ appearance of the scheme:

“The very nature of a change from an agricultural building to a dwelling will invariably introduce a more domestic appearance in the form of windows and doors.”

In response to the Council’s criticism of full height windows:

“The full height form of the windows would not be uncharacteristic in my view, given the size of openings commonly found on agricultural buildings.”

The most interesting comment from the Inspector however, in my opinion, draws a line once and for all under Staffordshire Moorlands District Council’s “resistance in principle” to the conversion of modern agricultural buildings:

“…the permitted development right under Class Q, which as its starting point, grants permission for agricultural buildings to be converted to dwellings, andit must therefore be the government’s intention that, in principle, such buildings can remain in the landscape and serve a new function as dwellings.”

This appeal decision sets a clear precedent for the acceptability of conversion of modern agricultural buildings under permitted development, and there are many sections of this appeal decision that we will refer to in future. It is hoped that the Planning Officers at SMDC will take on board the Inspector’s reasoning and take a more pragmatic view of these types of applications in future.

If you are considering a barn conversion under Permitted Development Class Q or are currently experiencing difficulties with, or a refusal of, a submitted application, please get in touch with us at Planning & Design Practice for advice on 01332 347371 or email enquiries@planningdesign.co.uk.

Class Q Appeal

GET IN TOUCH