Approval secured despite negative pre-application discussions

PDP_Negative Pre-App Discussions

Planning & Design Practice have secured planning approval for a 2 storey side and rear extension to a cottage in Hollington, Derbyshire. Not a particularly unusual situation on the face of it, but in this case we entered into detailed pre-application discussions with the Local Planning Authority – who held the view that they would not support the scale of the extensions proposed.

The original cottage had been extended previously, and not particularly sympathetically. The appearance of the building as it stands today is somewhat discordant, especially from the rear elevation, due to differing roof pitches. The proposed scheme therefore included alterations to the existing roof, and the resulting design (once the proposed extension is completed) will bring a sense of symmetry back to the property, especially when viewed from the rear.

From the front elevation, the side extension steps back on the front elevation and steps down on the roof line, which helps to show the extension as subordinate to the main part of the house, in compliance with the Council’s planning policy for householder extensions.

After the negative pre-application response, alternative design options were explored base on the comments from the LPA, however these could not achieve the required floor space for the client’s needs, plus the design itself ended up far more complex and cluttered in appearance.

It was therefore resolved to submit the application with the original, preferred design but with just a couple of minor changes to the detailing as an acknowledgment to the Council’s comments.

The submitted application was then approved, much to the delight of our clients, with just a standard condition requiring materials to match the existing house. The approved scheme meets their requirements for both additional ground floor space and first floor accommodation, whilst improving the overall appearance of the property.

On hearing the news of the approval, the homeowner said “That’s fantastic news. Your instinct was spot on, so however we all might feel about the pre planning activity it’s a major hurdle overcome!”

Obtaining planning permission can provide you with that dream home in the countryside or maybe the way of life you have always dreamt of. We have vast experience of working on rural projects for homeowners, landowners and farmers in rural areas. For more information about how we can assist with a rural planning project please do not hesitate to get in touch.

Surveyors RECAP 2019

PDP_Surveyors RECAP 2019

On Monday 16 September Jonathan Jenkin, Managing Director of Planning & Design addressed the 90 plus strong audience at Surveyors RECAP 2019, part of a series of seminars providing an invaluable CPD (Continuing Professional Development) update for rural practitioners and surveyors.

A non-profit making company, the aim of Surveyors RECAP Ltd is to broaden the knowledge of fellow rural professionals. The annual series of evening seminars they organise provide an important opportunity to explore the most pertinent rural topics facing the industry. A series of five consecutive Monday evenings which can be attended individually, or as a series, full attendance can give 15 hours or more CPD / Lifelong Learning as well as providing an excellent networking opportunity.

Hosted at the Roman Way Hotel in Cannock, Staffordshire and now in into its 34th year, this ever popular series updates rural surveyors and practitioners of all experiences, welcoming members of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS), the Central Association of Agricultural Valuers (CAAV) as well as farmers, lawyers, accountants, farm secretaries and other rural practitioners.

With vast experience of working on rural projects for homeowners, landowners and farmers in rural areas Planning & Design are perfectly positioned to address the audience. Under a general title of “Recent Changes to Planning Policy Affecting Development in the Rural Environment”, Jonathan updated the audience on changes in Permitted Development including changes of use to Class Q, which allows Change of Use and conversion of agricultural buildings to dwellings and Class R, which allows Change of Use from agriculture to a flexible business use. In addition Jonathan looked at ways of delivering a net gain for biodiversity, and possible changes in legislation due to the escalating climate crisis.

Speaking about his participation in the event Jonathan said:

“As a company we regularly run a series of seminars for architects, surveyors and agents, setting out changes in planning policies and new Government guidance. RECAP is a CPD event for young surveyors and with an audience of almost 100 young professionals it is always an enjoyable event, where I get the chance to run through real life examples, and they get the chance to challenge me.”

More information on Surveyor RECAP’s 2019 event programme can be found HERE

To find out more about how Planning & Design can help you achieve success with your rural development project, please don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Class Q appeal in Staffordshire Moorlands establishes that modern agricultural building conversion is acceptable

PDP_Class Q Appeal

Planning & Design Practice have recently won an appeal against refusal of Prior Approval by Staffordshire Moorlands District Council, in relation to a barn conversion under Class Q of Permitted Development.

This permission was hard won, involving 2 applications for prior approval and several re-designs of the scheme, along with the appeal against the second refusal, as well as providing comments in relation to the updated NPPF (July 2018) during the appeal process. Several members of the team were involved in the whole project, eventually achieving the result our clients were after by gaining approval from the Secretary of State’s appointed Inspector.

The Council has a reputation for strongly resisting applications under Class Q, when the building in question is of modern construction, as opposed to more historical barns that are built from brick or stone. However the permitted development legislation makes no distinction in this respect.

Indeed, it could be argued that Class Q has been enacted to facilitate the conversion of modern agricultural buildings, given that a normal planning permission for change of use is still an available route for applicants with traditional buildings.

Key points from the Inspector’s report that found favour with our arguments and evidence included; that the building is structurally capable of conversion; that none of the proposed works would fall outside of those building operations permitted, that they would be reasonably necessary for the building to function as a dwelling; and that the replacement of the roof materials, provided they are not structural elements, would fall within the scope of works permissible.

Other more general comments of note by the Inspector include:

“The nature of agricultural buildings will invariably mean that they will not have all of the necessary elements of a residential dwelling, or have them to the necessary standard or condition, hence the provisions of paragraph Q.1.(i).”

On the matter of the number of windows in the proposed scheme:

“I do not share the Council’s view that the number of windows proposed is excessive or unnecessary.”

In relation to the Council’s criticism of a ‘domestic’ appearance of the scheme:

“The very nature of a change from an agricultural building to a dwelling will invariably introduce a more domestic appearance in the form of windows and doors.”

In response to the Council’s criticism of full height windows:

“The full height form of the windows would not be uncharacteristic in my view, given the size of openings commonly found on agricultural buildings.”

The most interesting comment from the Inspector however, in my opinion, draws a line once and for all under Staffordshire Moorlands District Council’s “resistance in principle” to the conversion of modern agricultural buildings:

“…the permitted development right under Class Q, which as its starting point, grants permission for agricultural buildings to be converted to dwellings, andit must therefore be the government’s intention that, in principle, such buildings can remain in the landscape and serve a new function as dwellings.”

This appeal decision sets a clear precedent for the acceptability of conversion of modern agricultural buildings under permitted development, and there are many sections of this appeal decision that we will refer to in future. It is hoped that the Planning Officers at SMDC will take on board the Inspector’s reasoning and take a more pragmatic view of these types of applications in future.

If you are considering a barn conversion under Permitted Development Class Q or are currently experiencing difficulties with, or a refusal of, a submitted application, please get in touch with us at Planning & Design Practice for advice on 01332 347371 or email enquiries@planningdesign.co.uk.

Class Q Appeal

GET IN TOUCH