Secretary of State to decide fate of Derby Assembly Rooms

PDP_Derby Assembly Rooms

Councillors have backed controversial plans to demolish the 1970s Derby Assembly Rooms but have handed the final decision to the Secretary of State. Planning & Design Practice Ltd Managing Director Jonathan Jenkin writes about this latest development.

In a personal capacity I objected to the demolition of the Derby Assembly rooms because I felt that the building could be retained either as a venue or be available for re-purposing. I spoke at the meeting and I asked members consider using the building as part of the revival of the city centre rather than turning their backs on the building. The council has declared a climate emergency. Demolishing this building and building new will exacerbate climate change not reduce it and will see the waste of a building which could be re-purposed or continue to be used.

The reason the council want to demolish the building is that the proposed major refurbishment of the building has become too expensive. This refurbishment is not about re-opening the doors, it is to re-make the Assembly Rooms as a performance venue that is future proof rather than being willing to use what is there. The refurbishment would take at least a couple of years and the costs have ballooned because the works must last at least 15 years and that brings into question the original construction of the building.

It is complex situation but the council has not looked at repairing what is there and opening the doors. We need to revive the city centre now and the building can help and not hinder the revival as it will do if it is abandoned. In 2014 the building was operating and was safe. The ground floor of the building continued to be used until 2018 and parts of the building could be re-opened tomorrow and thus breathe new life into Market Square.

The council are committing to the proposed Becketwell venue on the edge of the city centre and there is no need for two city centre performance venues. This I believe has affected the decision making process and make the Assembly Rooms seem less important. It must be considered that the St James Securities venue may never be built and while waiting for the new venue the Assembly Rooms will deteriorate and the city centre will suffer.

The planning application has been called in by the Secretary of State. This provides a second opportunity to object to the proposed demolition. I call on all those who want to save the building to push for a further report on the building with the aim of re-opening the doors and in the meantime for the council to re-open those parts of the building including providing short term leases for the former restaurant and the tourist information centre so these and any other parts of the building can re-open this summer.

Jonathan Jenkin, Managing Director, Planning & Design Practice Ltd

Derby Assembly Rooms

Robert Evans – Save the Assembly Rooms

PDP_Rob Evans Save the Assembly Rooms, Derby Assembly Rooms

Writing for Planning & Design Practice Ltd, Architect Robert Evans from Evans Vettori outlines why he believes Derby’s iconic Assembly Rooms should be saved and repurposed as the heart of the city’s Market Square.

As a local architect, in practice in Derbyshire for over 25 years, I strongly object to the current proposal to demolish the Assembly Rooms. I have spent many happy evenings in the venue enjoying music, pantomime and beer festivals. This building is arguably the finest 20th century building in the City of Derby.

Whilst its so-called ‘70s Brutalist’ style is currently unfashionable, as time passes, it will inevitably be re-evaluated as has happened with other once controversial styles. There can be no doubt that Post-War architecture is increasingly appreciated by a wider public.

The Assembly Rooms is a carefully designed building in the centre of the city and is recognised as a historic asset that contributes to the appearance and character of the City Centre Conservation Area. The submitted documents that accompany the application for demolition state clearly that demolition will harm the Conservation Area and therefore the city centre. With nothing to replace this building, demolition will be an act of vandalism that will further damage Derby and its image across the country.

Market Square is the very heart of the city. The building itself is very robustly built and is in good structural repair. The Structural condition report states that the building is suffering only minor structural defects. The application to demolish it seems timed to hastily bulldoze the building before its current Certificate of Immunity from Listing expires in May.

Derby desperately needs a large venue, befitting this important regional city. Assuming you had a budget of say £30m, and two options, which makes the most sense?

Option 1: At great cost, demolish a huge amount of reinforced concrete, creating vast quantities of landfill and releasing embodied CO2, then pay for a temporary tart-up of an empty city-centre site. Use whatever is left in the hope of starting from scratch on a site further away from the Cultural Quarter.

Option 2: Use all the available money to upgrade and refurbish the perfectly robust and useable venue that you already have.

It seems blindingly obvious to me that option 2 represents much better value for tax-payers money. Many people who care about Derby, both locally and nationally, feel the same way as I do. Below is a link to my petition, now exceeding 1,400 signatures, which will be delivered to Derby City Council before the planning meeting, scheduled for 8 April.

https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/save-the-assembly-rooms

Robert Evans, Founding Director, Evans Vettori

Reappraising brutalist architecture

PDP_Brutalist Architecture

Some of the finest examples of brutalist architecture in the north of England are at risk of being torn down, according to Simon Phipps, the photographer behind the book Brutal North, who believes a crucial part of the country’s architectural history could be lost in the process.

Lindsay Cruddas, a RIBA accredited Specialist Conservation Architect from Planning & Design Practice Ltd shares her thoughts on this divisive architectural style, the factors involved in considering the listing and conservation of buildings and the role that the re-evaluation and re-use of Brutalist buildings can play in a zero carbon future.

Design is subjective and Brutalist Architecture isn’t everyone’s cup of tea. In fact, moons ago I would have also wondered why a derelict 1950s brutalist building isn’t being knocked down for redevelopment. However, opinions change and so does our perception of Heritage.

Victorian architecture was once new and the following generation wanted to tear it down to make way for new buildings, fortunately much of it survives today given the relatively slow turn around on buildings occupancy.

Brutalist architecture, which are largely constructed from concrete expanses of blank walls and dominating structures, were mainly used for large scale developments such as flats, universities, and public buildings. A favourite of mine is the Roger Stevens Building at the University of Leeds, the structure is of an impressive scale and connects several spaces together. The building is a central figure in the city campus and negotiates the change in levels of the site with a grand concrete staircase. The building was designed by Chamberlin, Powell and Bon and built at the campus in the late 1960s. The striking façade expresses the ventilation services in concrete and internally the building uses ramped circulation to access the lecture theatres. The building was only listed in 2010 but because of its Significance it was Grade II* listed.

Conservation and listing of buildings is dependent on several factors of why a place is importance and what is its significance. They are broken down into the following categories:

  • Evidential value: the potential of a place to yield evidence about past human activity.
  • Historical value: the ways in which past people, events and aspects of life can be connected through a place to the present – it tends to be illustrative or associative.
  • Aesthetic value: the ways in which people draw sensory and intellectual stimulation from a place.
  • Communal value: the meanings of a place for the people who relate to it, or for whom it figures in their collective experience or memory.

As we move further into the 21st Century, some of these buildings are now 50-70 years old, they are the next stage of our architectural history. Of course, not every single brutalist building deserves to be listed however they do deserve a second chance. Take Park Hill in Sheffield, it was in a dilapidated state until recent years and now it has been refurbished into office space, a nursery, residential and student accommodation. The building has had a new lease of life and is a vibrant area of Sheffield once again.

Locally Derby Assembly Rooms could be listed to help secure its future. The building has Aesthetic value in its striking appearance with expanse of concrete and domineering stature. The building has communal value, for may people the building will be known for concerts and performances and the annual Derby Young Farmers Ball.

As a nation we wanted to be carbon zero by 2016, which was never going to be achievable, but part of our future is the reuse of existing buildings. The sensitive restoration and imaginative adaptation to these brutalist buildings could assist in the carbon zero goal as well as retaining a key part of our architectural history.

Lindsay Cruddas, Specialist Conservation Architect, Planning & Design Practice Ltd

Planning Design recognise the importance of the built heritage in our towns, villages and rural areas. We have worked on numerous schemes affecting Listed Buildings, Conservation Areas and the Derwent Valley Mills World Heritage Site. Director Jon Millhouse specialises in heritage planning and design team leader Lindsay Cruddas is a registered Specialist Conservation Architect.

Please don’t hesitate to contact us for a no obligation consultation to discuss your particular building or project.

The future of Derby Assembly Rooms

PDP_Future of Derby Assembly Rooms

Jonathan Jenkin, Managing Director of Planning & Design Practice Ltd has objected to the proposed demolition of Derby Assembly Rooms. This large and iconic building dominates Market Square and has hosted numerous events and has been at the heart of city activities for almost 40 years.

The building was built to a high standard but a fire on the adjacent car park roof in 2014 destroyed the main plant and machinery and this immediately led to the central functions, the assembly rooms themselves being closed. The carpark remained open for use and it continues to be used and provides funds to the council. The ground floor restaurant space overlooking Market Square remained in use as did the tourist information centre until the council moved the tourist office to Riverside Chambers. Using insurance monies some repairs we made to the plant and machinery but the Assembly Rooms has never re-opened.

The Assembly Rooms themselves have become dated and are not now considered to be suitable for use as a major concert venue and for live theatre without a major overall and partial redevelopment. Renovating and updating the Assembly Rooms will be expensive and a new event, concert venue and theatre have been approved on land across the city centre at Becketwell. The council cannot afford to support both projects and two similar venues are unlikely to be viable in the city. The council were however supporting the renovation of the Assembly Rooms but costs have spiralled due to the council’s requirement of a minimum 15 year lifespan for operation following renovation and this requires that the existing building structure can be guaranteed to last at least a further 15 years without major further expenditure. The problem is that as a 1970s construction the building contains roof panels that only had a projected 30 year life span. To remove and replace these would be expensive and has made the project unviable. However the roof panels are in good condition and have not deteriorated and could easily last a further 30 years without needing removal. This cannot be proved, so essentially it is a matter of insurance rather than the condition of the building.

The council have thus applied to demolish the Assembly Rooms with no plans for anything to replace it. Leaving a large void in the heart of the city would be devastating and the plans for an area of open space are poor and ill conceived. The removal of the Assembly Rooms would lead to the loss of a whole side of Market Square with no existing buildings at the rear of the Assembly Rooms to front the square.

The detailed structural report that accompanied the application for demolition found the building to be essentially sound and in good order for its age and having been empty for 6 years. The Assembly Rooms are a strong piece of architecture which contribute to the appearance and character of the city but it divides opinion (similar in its Marmite character to the famous Preston Bus Station).

Starting with a new brief, the council should undertake minor works sufficient to allow the building to re-open. The fire damage is not as extensive as first thought and new plant and machinery can be installed. The Pick Everard report states that the roof does not present a danger to the public. Whist the roof needs to be the subject of regular inspection it would allow the building to re-open.

Firstly the council should re-open the shops and restaurants on the ground floor as part of the regeneration of the city centre. Most the ground floor fronting Market Square can be opened up for very little money and although the rents will be lower because of the collapse of retail, it would allow new businesses to open up breathing new life into the Cathedral Quarter. The tourism information centre should re-open in Market Square so that visitors to the city can continue to be supported but using a central location that is visible to the public.

To prosper the city centre needs visitors, the hotels in the city need support, the museums and shops need support. It is folly to the extreme to lose the visibility of tourist information from the centre of the city. The Darwin suite of the Assembly Rooms could be re-opened in the spring following the relaxation of Covid 19 rules for conferences, events and meetings including weddings. Offices around the suite can be let and the city can use catering companies which currently support Connect Derby to provide food and beverage.

The main issue is what to do with the Assembly Rooms themselves. The Assembly Rooms is a dated working theatre space and events space but who could use it? The Guildhall is used by local amateur dramatics groups and as a small venue for touring theatre and the Assembly Rooms because of its size and scale is not appropriate for these groups. The Guildhall itself is currently closed. The Assembly Rooms theatre and events space could be used by Academy trusts and LA secondary schools, sixth forms for youth based performances, for graduations and for a wide variety of other events as it has always done.

It would allow young people the opportunity to perform in a good sized auditorium, and as a semi-professional space with technical support and management (perhaps extending DEda’s brief) paid for through a variety of sources including the education authorities and trusts and through income generated by events. Being in the city centre it is accessible by young people who can travel in by bus and by non-car means.

For secondary schools and sixth form it could be a new shared facility. With a population of over 260,000 and more than 28,000 secondary school children and sixth formers the number of events and the level of use could easily justify the continued use of the space. The space would also be open through the council for others to use where the education calendar would allow. Using the Assembly Rooms in this way would bring young people into the city centre and their parents. It would add to the vitality to the city centre and would make the city a city of opportunity.

We need to breathe new life into the city centre and re-using what we have is a more sustainable option. Small steps, opening up the Assembly Rooms and getting events going will do much to help to revive the city centre. The commitment of the council to the re-use of the Assembly Rooms and the opening up of active uses onto Market Square will show the councils self-belief and from there private sector investment will follow.

Now more than ever we need to invest in our city and our people, particularly our young people. The council needs to be more ambitious and use what it has as well as looking to build its future.

GET IN TOUCH