Secretary of State to decide fate of Derby Assembly Rooms

PDP_Derby Assembly Rooms

Councillors have backed controversial plans to demolish the 1970s Derby Assembly Rooms but have handed the final decision to the Secretary of State. Planning & Design Practice Ltd Managing Director Jonathan Jenkin writes about this latest development.

In a personal capacity I objected to the demolition of the Derby Assembly rooms because I felt that the building could be retained either as a venue or be available for re-purposing. I spoke at the meeting and I asked members consider using the building as part of the revival of the city centre rather than turning their backs on the building. The council has declared a climate emergency. Demolishing this building and building new will exacerbate climate change not reduce it and will see the waste of a building which could be re-purposed or continue to be used.

The reason the council want to demolish the building is that the proposed major refurbishment of the building has become too expensive. This refurbishment is not about re-opening the doors, it is to re-make the Assembly Rooms as a performance venue that is future proof rather than being willing to use what is there. The refurbishment would take at least a couple of years and the costs have ballooned because the works must last at least 15 years and that brings into question the original construction of the building.

It is complex situation but the council has not looked at repairing what is there and opening the doors. We need to revive the city centre now and the building can help and not hinder the revival as it will do if it is abandoned. In 2014 the building was operating and was safe. The ground floor of the building continued to be used until 2018 and parts of the building could be re-opened tomorrow and thus breathe new life into Market Square.

The council are committing to the proposed Becketwell venue on the edge of the city centre and there is no need for two city centre performance venues. This I believe has affected the decision making process and make the Assembly Rooms seem less important. It must be considered that the St James Securities venue may never be built and while waiting for the new venue the Assembly Rooms will deteriorate and the city centre will suffer.

The planning application has been called in by the Secretary of State. This provides a second opportunity to object to the proposed demolition. I call on all those who want to save the building to push for a further report on the building with the aim of re-opening the doors and in the meantime for the council to re-open those parts of the building including providing short term leases for the former restaurant and the tourist information centre so these and any other parts of the building can re-open this summer.

Jonathan Jenkin, Managing Director, Planning & Design Practice Ltd

Derby Assembly Rooms

Covid, shopping and climate change

PDP_Retail Climate Change

As we ease out of lockdown, our Managing Director Jonathan Jenkin, looks at the changes that the Covid-19 pandemic has brought to our high streets, and the complex interplay between climate change and our retail habits.

Covid 19, the rise on online shopping and the collapse of multiple retailers provides opportunities to reduce travel demand and by doing so carbon emissions. The market has seen a rise in local shopping habits with vacancy rates in district and local centres remaining low. In Derby for example vacancy rates in suburban local shopping locations such as Chaddesden, Chelleston and Mickleover have remained low while vacancy rates in the city centre have soared as multiple retailers and banks have deserted the city.

This means that people are shopping locally and much of the comparison goods shopping is taking place online. In order for new retail business to locate in the city centre they will need a significant drop in rents and rates as retail is now far more competitive because online shops do not have the costs of bricks and mortar. Retail is still needed to help to support non-retail social and leisure activity. Eating and experiences combined with specialist shopping should help centres to regain their vitality and viability and by staging events and conferences in city centres trade will revive and activity levels will increase. Most city centres have good public transport options and the centres are often in easy walking distance of inner city residential areas. They need to become the focus for civic and public activities so that events and nights out can take place without significantly increasing carbon emissions.

During the Covid pandemic out of town shopping has however seemed to be a safe place to shop. Shoppers are insulated from others by driving and vacancy rates in out of town car based retailing have held up well. Car based shopping is not good in terms of climate change. Not only is it wasteful of land and creates vast areas of tarmac but carbon emissions to regional and local retail parks is significantly higher than either town centres or local shopping. It maintains a dependence on the private car with the health and social dis-benefits that go with a car based lifestyle.

Covid and climate change provide an opportunity to revive the high street, renew city centres and create more sustainable cities. But to achieve this out of town retailing must be curbed. Britain has an over-supply of retail floorspace so it is depressing to hear that a major sub-regional outlet centre is to open in Cannock. It is supposed to create 1000 jobs in a town with a high unemployment rate but the centre is almost entirely car based and its opening will lead to more than 1000 jobs being lost elsewhere. Some of the regional shopping centres such as Meadowhall and the Metro Centre are showing their age and again these provide an opportunity for redevelopment and re-use for housing, offices and industry so it is disappointing that owners of these centres (most of which are now bankrupt and are being supported by the banking sector) are looking at revamping and expanding their centres as retail and leisure destinations.

Climate change needs us all to change to become less of a consumer society and a more healthy and socially aware society rooted in place where we have a network of friends and family living close to each other. Attractive and healthy places to work and to live with day to day needs met close to home allow children to reclaim the streets, it allows older people and those with disability to get the services they need close to home, it means more time spent outside walking and cycling and more time being part of a town and village rather than as an atomised consumer rooted to the next gadget.

We have major challenges ahead but also major opportunities to create a better society. Retail presents an interesting picture, two directions of travel but only one that is compatible with the long term health of our society and with climate change.

New road and roundabout signals start of Ashbourne regeneration scheme

PDP_Ashbourne Regeneration

As planning consultants and agents we have been working with the developers FW Harrison since 2011 to facilitate the largest single development site in the Derbyshire Dales. Work on this multi-million pound scheme will unlock land for employment and housing development, helping to drive the regeneration of Ashbourne.

Having first achieved outline planning permission in 2015 we obtained detailed consent for the link road and this led to a technical start being made on the road in 2019. Since then the county council submitted revised proposals for the roundabout and modifications to the link road and the developers submitted a fresh outline planning permission for the whole site which was agreed earlier this year.

The Airfield site will release up to 20ha of new industrial and commercial development. This will provide a major boost to the economy at a time when the economic performance of the Derbyshire Dales is being suppressed by Covid 19 lockdown restrictions. It should help to lower future unemployment rates in the Ashbourne area as it will allow the expansion of existing businesses located on the Airfield industrial estate, it will facilitate the creation of new businesses and attract new companies to the area.

The new link road will provide a second access onto Blenheim Road which will lower congestion on the Derby Road. It will provide a new high quality entrance to the town; the new road will be landscaped and will contain wide footpaths and a cycleway. A new bus service will be routed along the new road and the road and the commercial and industrial development will be drained to a large balancing pond which will also serve as an area for wildlife. The new development will reduce the potential for flooding from the Airfield and the new drainage features and landscaping will protect existing housing on the edge of the airfield from increased noise and disturbance.

There is planning permission for 367 houses and in Phase II of the development a further area of housing and community facilities is proposed as part of the Adopted Local Plan adding up to 1200 new homes. This is in line with sustainable development principles and will provide homes close to work, schools and neighbourhood shopping and community facilities. With good public transport and a network of footpaths and cycle ways, the extension of Ashbourne will create a balanced sustainable community. New areas of open space will be provided with play areas and areas for outdoor sports and recreation. There will be a choice in the modes of transport and the development will not rely on the private car. The Airfield presents a major opportunity for the District to accommodate new development sustainably, with housing for the whole community, from apartments and bungalows for the elderly to large family homes. There will be mixed tenure with the housing to rent as well as homes to buy. There will be affordable housing, some of which may be developed by the Council’s housing arm.

The opening up of the airfield site through the construction of the new roundabout and the link road is very exciting and is an important milestone in realising the vision for the site. This is a shared vision of the County and District authorities and by the developers and their consultants. All sides have worked hard to get this project off the ground and in these uncertain times the start of this key project is to be warmly welcomed.

Jonathan Jenkin, Managing Director, Planning & Design Practice Ltd

Main Image: Jacobs Engineering

Planning & Design have a wealth of experience in designing and securing planning permission for commercial projects. We have the required skills to design both small and large scale schemes in-house and tailor the design to the client’s unique specifications.

Unsure of your site’s potential? Contact us on 01332 347371 for a no obligation consultation, we are able to provide our professional opinion on the planning potential of your property from the outset.

The East Midlands Development Corporation – is the proposed freeport a Trojan horse?

PDP_East Midlands Development Corporation

The proposed East Midlands Development Corporation seems to be a reincarnation of the former East Midlands Development Agency that was killed off by the Cameron Government back in 2011. That is not to say that it is not welcomed.

All three sites are linked to HS2 and their development will help to cement the second phase of HS2 and importantly it will integrate HS2 into the wider economic and social fabric of the East Midlands. Toton and Radcliffe on Soar are both large brownfield sites whose redevelopment linked to the rail network and to other public transport links has the potential to be sustainable development.

East Midlands Airport (EMA) and the proposed ‘Freeport’ status is a more difficult proposition in planning, economic and climate change terms. As a freight airport, EMA has been very much less affected by Covid 19 than other airports across the UK and this is welcomed. If air freight continues to increase and operators begin to use direct access to the rail network then there is the possibility of lower CO2 emissions but this will require much reduced aircraft emissions. Emission levels will not increase if the airport’s freight expansion is created using slots currently reserved for air passengers. It would also have the effect of improving the long term economic health of the airport.

The freeport status for EMA is intended to stimulate economic activity due to government stimulus or tax breaks and there can be an agglomeration effect for particular sectors of the economy. The main advantage of freeports is that they encourage imports by lowering duty and paperwork costs. Manufacturing businesses that are inside the freeport can benefit from cheaper imported inputs/components in comparison to those outside the area.

On the other hand, the UK Trade Policy Observatory (UKTPO) cautions that the evidence of wider economic benefits of freeports and other zones are mixed, as they depend heavily on the design, access to transport infrastructure, skilled labour and capital within the zone in question. There is also a risk that freeports and zones don’t create new economic activity but rather divert existing business into the area with the allure of tax breaks – at a cost to the taxpayer in the form of lost revenue.

Ultimately, the UKTPO concludes that “whilst some form of free zones could help with shaping export-oriented and place-based regional development programmes, policymakers should (i) devise measures that counteract possible diversion of economic activity from elsewhere, and (ii) offer a wider set of incentives than just free zones, while keeping within the WTO [World Trade Organization] and any ‘level playing field’ obligations that arise from our trade agreements.”

The companies located next to EMA include Amazon and other large internet retailers. Internet retailers are already benefiting hugely from the Covid 19 crisis. Amazon in particular is creating a dominant position in the market which in there long term could have significant adverse economic and social effects. If internet retailers can also benefit from freeport status, with tax breaks and additional government support these companies will only be further advantaged. Internet retailing has seriously affected the high street, it has reduced the tax base in the UK and it has undermined pension funds. Combined with Covid 19 restrictions it is also affecting the social fabric and as the tax base is eroded the funding available for the NHS, for education and for investment reduces. We all in effect become poorer.

The government needed to ensure a level playing field for all UK based businesses. We all have to pay tax and this includes multinational internet retailers.

The proposed Freeport must not further advantage the advantaged and this cannot form part of the levelling up agenda as it will only achieve the opposite. The gap between wealth and poverty has increased during Covid. Investment must not exacerbate this but should seek to close the gap for the sake of our society and for the people of Britain.

Jonathan Jenkin, Managing Director, Planning & Design Practice Ltd

Main Image: Artists Impression – Midlands Engine

Approval in principle for new homes following virtual planning meeting

PDP_Approval in Principal

Planning & Design Practice Ltd are delighted to have secured approval in principle for 160 new homes on a large brownfield site near the village of Nether Heage, Derbyshire.

On Monday 15 June, members of Amber Valley Planning Board enthusiastically embraced running their first virtual committee meeting on Zoom. New protocols were used to allow all councillors to debate and comment on the applications before them. The meeting was managed by the Democratic Services Officer Rebecca Smith.

After a couple of short delays, the meeting got underway. Our client’s scheme for 160 dwellings was the first item to be decided on the agenda. In terms of context whilst not in the built framework of the village of Nether Heage, it is on the edge and it is a large brownfield site which is on the Councils Brown field Sites Register and therefore a priority for housing development. There were three objectors and the local ward councillor who spoke on the matter. Each was introduced and each was given three minutes. Stopping people speaking after 3 minutes was simple for Rebecca Smith who managed the event. The main concern for objectors was not the principle of development but the increase in people who would live in the village and use local services including Heage School. The objectors saw it as a problem of an increase in traffic and pedestrian vehicle conflict and congestion around school times. Objectors did not take into account the reductions of heavy vehicle traffic that would result or the financial gains to local schools and support for playing fields. As Agent I spoke last picking up on the points raised and reaffirming the strong case for planning approval.

Members generally welcomed the work we had done with the applicant to reduce the numbers of homes, address issues around drainage and importantly reduce the site area itself so that land within the Green Belt was not included. The debate was limited and the application was approved unanimously.

The next step is now the Section 106 to cover matters of off -site funding and monitoring. This needs to be signed and the Decision Notice issued. Previously on this site the committee approved a slightly larger scheme which included green belt land (but only as open space) only to revoke their decision before the Decision notice was issued due to changes in the local plan. This led to the application being re-presented to committee and refused last year. At every stage the application has had the professional support of the council’s planning team.

We are very pleased to have an approval in principle. The appeal on the larger scheme will continue to run until we have the Planning Permission. The client’s legal advisers will be working with the council to agree the Section 106 over the coming weeks.

Getting planning permission on this site has been very frustrating for me and for our client. We had an approval in principle back in the spring of 2019, over 12 months ago. The Section 106 legal agreement had been signed and we were just waiting for the Decision Notice to be issued. A day before we were expecting the Decision Notice, the council pulled the application on the grounds that having dropped the Local Plan, they had a 5-year housing supply.

This led to the previous application being re-presented to the planning committee. There had been a change in political control after the May 2019 local election and the new controlling group refused the application on thin grounds, but principally because the application site area included green belt land even though this land was not going to be built on.

We submitted an appeal, but we also amended the proposals to address some of the concerns that had been raised. We expect that the Decision notice will be issued shortly and that a further reserved matters application can follow on. A change in political control can have ramifications for development and for developers. Delay is a cost which is often overlooked. It also required our client to pay for revised proposals and for an appeal submission. Running an appeal can be very useful where a council has refused an application on political grounds not planning grounds. The impact of a costs claim and the political ramifications can be great particularly if another political group seek to use it to highlight waste in the council through poor decision making. An appeal can strengthen your position, and whilst it needs to be there and be known it should not be used explicitly at planning committee.

Roger Hartshorn, Director, Garner Holdings Ltd said:

“This is great news for Nether Heage and will ultimately provide a perfect backstop for the historic windmill. The houses are needed within the area and will also give the benefit of stopping commercial vehicles winding through the village. We are now actively looking and working with AVBC to find an alternate site so that the employment and jobs can be retained within the locality.”

Jonathan Jenkin, Managing Director, Planning & Design Practice Ltd

Approval in Principle
Image: Sylvia Hill / Nottingham and Derby Hot Air Balloon Club

New opportunities in property arising from the lockdown

PDP_New Opportunities

Our Managing Director, Jonathan Jenkin looks at the new opportunities in property that could arise following the Covid-19 lockdown and as we look to re-start the economy.

In terms of land use and planning the effects of the lockdown have been to reinforce existing trends that have come from the use of new technology. The lockdown has also taken place within the context of the climate emergency and the issues relating to Co2 emissions and plastics have not gone away.

The social impact of the lockdown has had some positive effects for some people. It has given many working people extended time with their families, it has allowed them to re-evaluate what is important in their lives and with the reductions in traffic and noise, time to appreciate spring and the benefits of the natural world. It has also given people more time to consider their health and the benefits of taking outdoor exercise and it has re-enforced the importance of outdoor space and parks.

The disruption in our lives has severely reduced our ability to travel and it has stopped many people from visiting family members, particularly those in care homes. This has placed an emphasis on the importance of family and friends and although social media and the virtual world has proved a lifeline for many, the lack of social contact is difficult and it has exposed the digital divide in terms of income and understanding.

The lockdown has also placed a very great emphasis on the home, the quality of the home and the flexibility of the home to accommodate home schooling and home working. It has also exposed the lack of private outside space and the lack of security of tenure suffered by many families. Poor quality housing can make living and working from home really difficult, inadequate personal space and overcrowding compounds the problem, and with insecurity and a poor quality external environment a poor quality home can create serious mental health and social problems. In addition a lack of security of tenure affects the wider community as people cannot afford to put down roots because they may have to leave at any time.

For business many companies have been pushed into adopting home working, working remotely and in relying on digital platforms to deliver services. It has led many to question whether they need to hold as many meetings face to face, whether they need to travel so much and whether they need as much office space. The lockdown has hit the hospitality sector hard, and it is not certain that many café’s, bars, pubs and restaurants will be able to re-open if social distancing is maintained.

The lockdown has also affected retail trading. For those shops that are open, social distancing has limited the number of customers that can be in a shop at any one time. This has reduced the volume of trade and it has forced customers to go to shops only when they have to. Waiting in the street two metres behind someone else in a queue is not an enjoyable experience. Add to this that many customers are frightened to go into shops because of the risk of infection, shopping becomes even less attractive. When a wider range of shops can re-open, building up business will be difficult and slow. If most café’s, bars, pubs and restaurants cannot re-open because they cannot enforce social distancing then shopping will remain a functional experience based on need. This will limit local shopping to convenience food and essentials with the remaining trade permanently shifting to the internet. What role then for the regional shopping centres, the high street and the city centre?

Our high streets have been struggling for years. The growth of retailing floor space in the 1990s and 2000s, (most of it car based shopping) drained many high streets and after 2008, the financial crash and austerity combined with the growth in internet shopping and services (particularly banking) has emptied the high street.

Property owners will need to find new ways to generate an income. Housing, small workplace accommodation and small specialist shops command far lower rents. Creating larger units to accommodate existing cafés and restaurants to maintain social distancing will also reduce floor space rental values.

To try to maintain long term incomes; owners will need to look again at their buildings and how they can use their estate better. Many buildings are more than half empty, as landlords have relied on ground floor retail income, leaving often thousands of square feet of useable floor space empty. Landlords will also have to invest in their buildings taking the responsibility to maintain and develop them. Working with neighbouring landowners can also offer the prospect of regeneration and renewal.

With property funds and landlords forced by circumstance to become actively involved, the high street can be renewed into a residentially and economically dense area, with people working and living from home and working from smaller work places, above or next to local shops and facilities, where they can walk and cycle to open space, schools, cultural and social centres. Places where people can move easily between home and work. Getting people out of their cars will also reduce social isolation and foster community.

The high street can lead the green revolution. In urban quarters such as Kelham Island in Sheffield, buildings have been adapted to new uses and new high density, high quality living and working spaces have been created.

Easy access to friends and family will be more available to more people now that remote working has proved possible. Fewer people will need to commute, or commute less often but living spaces will need to be larger to accommodate home and work and have access to open space. A sense of community can be created and fostered, with residents having a shared interest with their neighbours and neighbouring businesses. This will lead to less loneliness as more people are known to their neighbours. For this to work all new homes need to be secure, light, spacious, well insulated, with outside space and be cheap to light and heat.

Living and working in close proximity to others needs the adoption of new social norms to prevent anti-social behaviour. It will require more investment in mental health services and social safety nets. Buildings will need to be adaptable for all, allowing for multi-generational households, and allowing wheelchair user access to all buildings.

The redevelopment of space above shops must not become an opportunity to create poor quality housing for those who have nowhere else to live. The current office to residential permitted development rights are a national scandal and have led to inadequate housing developments which have blighted the lives of their residents. This needs to stop.

The lockdown has speeded up the process of a work place revolution, it has identified the shortcoming of existing residential accommodation and it has exposed the fragility of our community and society. In the context of future pandemics and with climate change, our society needs to be more robust to face the challenges of the future. Our town and city centres can lead the way to improved well being, they can foster greater community spirit and they can lead to a better life.

Jonathan Jenkin, Managing Director, Planning & Design Practice Ltd

The Planning System and Covid 19

PDP_Planning Covid 19

Writing for the Architects Journal, Tom de Castella has set out how the planning system is just one of many parts of life in the UK struggling to keep operating with the partial shutdown caused by the coronavirus.

A number of local authorities, including Carlisle City Council, have already cancelled their planning committees. Many say they are continuing as normal, but this will undoubtedly change as the government gets tougher on social distancing.

In Glasgow, council meetings have been suspended, with the chief executive and senior officers taking over the decision-making process. A spokesperson for Leeds City Council said its chief planning officer would assess time-critical decisions anticipated over the next three months. In Aberdeen, planning development committees are one of the few committees to continue working and its meetings will take place as scheduled. Likewise in Cardiff, the planning department is ‘continuing as normal’ although all services will be reviewed in the light of new government guidelines, according to a council spokesperson.

The Architects Journal sets out the mixed responses from many different planning authorities across the UK. I am writing this at a desk at home, with all the Planning and Design team working from home until the crisis is over.

We ourselves spoke to twenty LPA’s on the 23rd March. All were continuing to operate a planning service, albeit many planners were working from home and all planning committees were suspended. For most, urgent decisions will continue to be made, through delegation or though consideration by chief officers and members of planning committees remotely. For example, some forms of prior notification have fixed time limits which if breached lead to an automatic permission. These will be decided by planning officers. Decisions on key development sites will either be put on hold or decided by officers and committee members working remotely. This may call into question the validity of decisions made on controversial sites because the objectors or supporters of a site or development will not have their say, so councillors will not be able to consider all the views that might otherwise be expressed.

By the end of this week we should be in a better position to understand how the system will operate as the restrictions continue to apply. I will provide all our readers with an update on individual councils once they have an agreed protocol moving forward.

Jonathan Jenkin, Managing Director, Planning & Design Practice Ltd

Matlock looks at Climate Change

PDP_Matlock Climate Crisis

At the Town Council meeting in June Matlock Town Council declared a climate and ecological emergency. There was unanimous support for the motion proposed by Councillor Matt Buckler. The motion is seeking to put in place local actions that can make a difference.

Cllr Buckler said,

“We’ve heard some fantastic examples of things that people have done, but we need everyone to be doing it. To help this we need all of our tiers of government to take action where they can and help those within our communities to do the same. We will work with the District and County Councils, and learn from other good examples from around the country to ensure Matlock is an environmental beacon, as we work towards being a zero carbon town by 2030.”

Are you concerned about Climate Change? Do you want to find out more about what is being done locally? Have you got ideas to share or questions to ask?

On Saturday 14th September the Council are holding a special event, an opportunity to understand the environmental challenges ahead, what you can do to help resolve them day to day and share ideas on the most pressing and important issue of our time.

10am – 2pm
Imperial Rooms, Imperial Road, Matlock, DE4 3NL
FREE ENTRY

Get tickets on the door or book via Eventbrite or Facebook

Jonathan Jenkin, Managing Director at Planning & Design who are exhibiting at the event

“Climate change is going to affect everyone and as architects and planners we are in a good position to use our professional skills and experience to design buildings in locations which will be more robust in facing the challenges of climate change. This means building in locations where there is good public transport where workers or residents can walk to services and facilities without using a car, in buildings which can better cope with climate change because they are highly insulated and are warm in winter and cool in summer, generate energy through solar power, having heating systems which do not use gas, oil or burn coal or wood and use very little energy. It is also important that the building of the future looks good and stay looking good with the minimum of maintenance. Future buildings also will have high levels of natural daylight and can enhance biodiversity by accommodating protected species within the building fabric and providing opportunities for a wide variety of plants and animals to thrive”.

For more information on the event please contact Matlock Town Council on 01629 583042 or via email at enquiries@matlock.gov.uk Facebook: @AllThingsMatlock

RIBA announces shortlist for Inaugural Neave Brown Award for Housing

PDP_RIBA Neave Brown Awards 2019

The Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) announced on Thursday 25 July the shortlist for the very first Neave Brown Award for Housing, named in honour of the late Neave Brown (1929 – 2018).

Neave Brown was a socially-motivated, modernist architect, best known for designing a series of celebrated London housing estates. In 2018, he was awarded the UK’s highest honour for architecture, the Royal Gold Medal for Architecture, which is approved personally by Her Majesty The Queen.

The four housing developments in the running for the 2019 Neave Brown Award for Housing are:

Brentford Lock West Keelson Gardens, London, by Mae Architects

Thoughtful canalside development comprising six large apartment buildings, with distinctive saw-tooth roofs reflecting the site’s industrial past, linked with rows of four storey townhouses.

Eddington Lot 1, Cambridge, by WilkinsonEyre with Mole Architects

Designed for the University of Cambridge, this new residential quarter is an exemplar of integrated urban design. Incorporating a variety of housing types including generous apartments, some wrapped around a new supermarket and integrated with a new doctor’s surgery.

Goldsmith Street, Norwich, by Mikhail Riches with Cathy Hawley

Large development of 105 highly energy-efficient homes for social rent, designed to Passivhaus standards for Norwich City Council.

The Colville Estate, London, by Karakusevic Carson Architects with David Chipperfield Architects

Bold regeneration of a Hackney Council housing estate, designed and delivered in close engagement with residents, to provide 925 new homes in a neighbourhood of legible streets and open spaces.

The shortlist was selected from the 2019 RIBA Regional Awards winners by an expert panel of judges: RIBA President Ben Derbyshire; Director at Levitt Bernstein Jo McCafferty; and Professor Adrian Gale, formally of the School of Architecture at the University of Plymouth.

On the shortlist, Jonathan Jenkin, Managing Director of Planning & Design Practice Ltd said

‘It is good to see public housing and public bodies such as the University of Cambridge being recognised. All the schemes are exemplars and aim to provide high quality accommodation on difficult sites. Good quality public housing is essential if we are going to raise the quality of housing generally and meet the challenges of housing which is fit for purpose and long lasting and housing that meets the challenge of climate change’.

To be considered for the 2019 Neave Brown Award for Housing, projects needed to be a winner of a 2019 RIBA Regional Award, be a project of ten or more homes completed and occupied between 1 November 2016 and 1 February 2019 and one third of the housing needed to be affordable and should demonstrate evidence of meeting the challenge of housing affordability.

The winner of the Neave Brown Award for Housing will be announced at the RIBA Stirling Prize ceremony on Tuesday 8 October 2019.

Viability – does the new NPPF represent a seismic shift?

PDP_NPPF Viability

The level of public goods to be provided alongside development in the form of affordable housing and payments towards schools, health, highways Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) and open space (tariff payments) is often challenged by developers in the name of ‘viability’. Providing public goods is expensive; a scheme for 150 houses can generate education payments of £1.2m upwards, with another half a million on payments towards health, CIL and open space. This is before the direct costs of roads, main services and ground conditions are taken into account. A standard 30% affordable housing requirement will reduce the market housing element of a 150 house scheme to 105 homes. This means that all the infrastructure and tariff costs are shouldered by a smaller number of houses than the planning permission indicates.

Viability appraisals have been used as a way for developers to reduce these costs by arguing that the costs of developing a site are too great to allow the full range of public goods to be provided. Often it is the ‘abnormal costs’ – the de-contamination of land, or dealing with difficult topography which can make a site less viable. However issues of land/site value can come into play.

The approach to dealing with viability appraisals has varied across the country and this has fuelled public concern that developers are making money without providing the public goods that a community can rightfully expect. The government has reacted to these concerns in its updated National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) by attempting to standardise the method of calculating viability.

The starting point is that councils should set out their requirements for public goods in their local plans but in a way that does not undermine deliverability. Planning applications that comply with the plan should be considered as viable. This means that at the local plan examination stage, sites that get through examination as allocations are considered to be viable.

The value of land should have regard to development plan policies. This means that viability appraisals should be undertaken at the plan making stage using a new standard approach. The price paid for a site is not a relevant justification for failing to comply with the development plan and hope value should also be dis-regarded.

For existing allocated sites in plans where viability was not fully considered at the plan making stage the starting point for considering land value is ‘existing use value plus’. An agricultural greenfield site could have an existing use value of perhaps £12,000 per acre. For a brownfield former mining site this could be zero as the site contains liabilities. The ‘plus’ is a premium for the landowner, a profit to the developer of perhaps 15 -20%, abnormal costs and market evidence based on policy compliant schemes in the locality. The premium for the landowner ‘should reflect the minimum return which it is considered a reasonable landowner would be willing to sell their land’. This is further clarified in the Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) which states “The premium should provide a reasonable incentive for a landowner to being forward land for development while allowing a sufficient contribution to comply with policy requirements”.

It also requires developers to take an ‘open book’ approach, meaning that all future viability appraisals will be made public other than in exceptional circumstances.

It also means that it is the abnormal costs which become the focus for an appraisal and whether these are in fact reasonable. The public exposure will increase testing and will require LPAs to be seen to consider all aspects raised by the local community.

These measures should improve public confidence in the system and leave less room for manoeuvre for developers. It also means that the value of land is explicit and what the landowner receives is in the public domain. It will be interesting to see how this affects values and the potential political fallout that will follow on from such exposure.

Jonathan Jenkin is Managing Director at Planning & Design Practice

GET IN TOUCH