Derby Market Hall – Restored and ready for business

Derby Market Hall

As thoughts turn towards December 25th, and Christmas shopping for the big day, many Derby residents may well be missing their trip to the Derby Market Hall, to stock up on greeting cards and gifts, poultry and panettone. Derby Market Hall which opened on May 29th, 1866, cost £29,000 to build, and is a rare fine example of a Victorian Market Hall. An iconic landmark in the city centre, it is currently closed and being refurbished at a cost of £35 million. This site has a very long history of trading and community engagement, one that stretches back centuries.

At the end of the 16th century Derby had a population of 2000-2500. Many of these were involved in crafts and trades, or were retailers living in and around Irongate, the Market Place and Sadlergate. There was a baker’s shop in Babington Lane, butchers’ stalls in the Market Place, and tailors living on the Morledge. Cloth working was the town’s staple industry, and tailors and cloth workers had their own trade company1.

Previously the site of the Market Hall had been part of the Town Improvement Act when architect Matthew Habershon created a new market area behind the Guild Hall around 1835. It already contained permanent stalls, shops, a butter, egg and vegetable market but by the 1860’s this had become inadequate and it was cleared and built anew2.

Work on building the Market Hall was begun in 1864 with the laying of the foundation stone. It is a lofty and spacious tunnel vaulted space, built of red brick with stone dressings; and has semi-circular headed windows in arched recesses. The centre slightly projects and is of rusticated stone with a blind arch at each side and arched doorway at the centre. The sides have stone-coped brick parapets and centre a moulded cornice and open balustrade. An impressive interior which has an iron and glass barrel-vaulted roof with a central lantern light. The designer was Borough Surveyor Robert Thorburn, modified, after structural weaknesses had been noted, by his successor Edwin Thompson3.

The iron roof of Derby Market Hall covers an area of 220ft x 110ft. The roof span is 86ft 6ins with an apex at 64ft. The Derby Market Hall roof was built from cast iron and wrought-iron components. These were prefabricated by J. & G Haywood & Co of Phoenix Foundry, Derby (whose company was just over the Derwent on Nottingham Road).

Seventy years later, in the 1930s borough architect Herbert Aslin refitted the interior of the Market Hall with new stalls, this allowed the council to raise the rents.

These remained for around sixty years, until 1989 when further remedial work from Robert Thorburns work needed to be resolved, and new stalls were installed. Workmen discovered unique traces of Derby’s history during the renovation work. A well six feet and 30 feet deep was uncovered, which may have served the buildings that stood on the site prior to 1864. Tunnels were discovered running between the Lock Up Yard and the Guildhall. Experts believe they were probably used to move prisoners between the two areas4.

Barely thirty years later those market stalls were again in need of replacing and the building was in need of much needed repairs. Extreme weather such as strong winds, snow, or heavy rain caused a risk that the glass windows might came out of their frames.

This need for renovation presented the Council with an opportunity to transform the Grade II listed building into a contemporary and vibrant destination that will attract visitors from the region and beyond, and act as a showcase for the “Best of Derbyshire”. By linking Derbion and St Peter’s Quarter to the Cathedral Quarter and Becketwell, the transformed Market Hall is intended to serve as a flexible space used for entertainment and restaurants as well as markets offering the best of the region’s independent shopping, food and drink.

The first phase began with extensive roof and structural restoration of its cast iron, copper and glass roof. This was finished in August 2022 and needed a scaffolding structure weighing more than eight blue whales to complete the works.

During these renovations two-time capsules have been discovered by the contractors. They date from 1864 and 1938, the time of the previous renovations. These the time capsules have gone on display at the Derby Local Studies Library, in Full Street, as part of an exhibition, which will run until 16 January.

As one of the most prominent buildings in our city centre, and one envisaged to play such a central role in Derby’s future, the Council have grand ambitions for the revamped Market Hall to function as a seven-days-a-week destination for Derbyshire’s culinary and creative businesses. Equipped with facilities to include a bar and cosmopolitan food court, co-working space, gallery and performance spaces, the Market Hall aims to become a place people want to visit and spend time in again and again.

Time will tell how long this version of the Derby Market Hall will remain but if history tells us anything it is that this Derbyshire icon will continue to serve as a commercial and cultural centre, celebrating the heritage and spirit of innovation that are so distinctive to the region for centuries to come.

Ruth Gray, Heritage Consultant, Planning & Design Practice Ltd

References – Derby Market Hall:

1: Derbyshire Historic Environment Record MDR11254 – Medieval town, Derby

2: M. Craven. Derby An  Illustrated History.

3: Derbyshire Historic Environment Record MDR10367 – Market Hall, Market Place, Derby

4: BBC News: Victorian Derby Market Hall celebrates 150 years

Derby Market Hall and Osnabruck Square

Storage unit success

Storage Unit Success

Planning & Design Practice Ltd are delighted to announce a successful application for the erection of a storage building in Worksop, Nottinghamshire. The new building will provide additional storage space for the existing business, adjacent to the Chesterfield Canal.

Our client has been at the site for over 15 years, but a recent increase in demand means that an additional storage unit is required to continue the growth of the business long-term. As the district aims to provide sufficient opportunities for business growth and provide a range of jobs for local residents, this development is in-line with these principles to allow for sustainable business growth and cement continued longstanding investment into Worksop.

The storage unit is set within an existing industrial site bounded by other commercial related buildings, as well as being bordered by the Chesterfield Canal. In-line with the clients brief, our Architectural team, in collaboration with the Planning team, prepared a scheme that would not be imposing within the site and would sit comfortably and unobtrusively amongst the other industrial units.

Storage Unit – Plans

The development proposal for the new storage unit met multiple economic objectives that were set out in the Bassetlaw Local Development Framework. Our extensive knowledge of local planning policies, and site designations for commercial activity enabled us to secure planning permission on this occasion and secure jobs for the future for a sustainable business.

Planning & Design Practice Ltd is a multi-disciplinary team of Chartered Town Planners, Architects, Architectural Assistants and Heritage Specialists. Gaining planning permission is a key step in almost any development. We can take a project through from inception to completion, but we also offer the flexibility to engage a client’s own architects and provide a planning service, whilst our design team can also work with clients who have engaged other town planning professionals.

Planning & Design Practice Ltd are well versed in researching and understanding local Council’s policies to ensure the best possible case if put forward for our clients.

For a free, no obligation consultation to discuss your project, please don’t hesitate to get in touch on 01332 347371 or enquiries@planningdesign.co.uk.

Alfie Keelin, Planning Assistant, Planning & Design Practice Ltd

New life for Cathedral Green

Cathedral Green

Ambitious plans have been submitted by Wavensmere Homes Ltd and Wilson Bowden Developments Ltd for a 9 storey scheme to bring 186 new homes into the centre of Derby on the long standing vacant site next to Cathedral Green. The scheme also includes a café, residents amenity space, a gym, public and private landscaping, car and cycle parking and vehicular access off Full Street. Director Richard Pigott, with the assistance of research by Heritage Consultant Ruth Gray, critique the scheme and weigh up the pros and cons.

On the face of it, this riverside site is more sensitive, in historical terms, than some other recent major application sites in the city due to its location close to Grade I listed Cathedral Church of All Saints, the Grade II Silk Mill (Museum of Making), Bakewell’s Gates at The Silk Mill, St Mary’s Bridge, Magistrates Court and Amen Alley. It is also situated in the UNESCO Derwent Valley World Heritage Buffer Zone, the Derby City Centre Area of archaeological interest and adjacent to the City Centre Conservation Area.

It would be hard to argue that the development will not affect, to some extent, the setting of the Cathedral and the Silk Mill given their close proximity. However, this part of Derby has seen many changes throughout the centuries and Cathedral Green is, to my surprise, a recent construct. The industrial revolution, of which Derby was a key instigator, dominated this part of the city, with factories utilising the nearby canals, river and railways. As can be seen in the photograph below, the Silk Mill and the Cathedral (tower in the foreground) were surrounded by chimneys and industry in the early part of the 20th century.

1928 photograph. Source: Historic England

Since commerce and industry have moved out of the city centre to places like Pride Park and further afield, this part of Derby has been in steady decline and the application site itself has been boarded up for many years and become something of an eyesore.

Derby Civic Society have objected to the proposal which has said it would “wreck the historic skyline of Derby”. However, does this ignore or overlook the history of innovation and evolution within the city? As we have seen above, this part of Derby has changed across the ages in response to economic and social forces and why should this evolution not continue now? No key views or vistas of the cathedral will be blocked or interrupted as far as I can tell. Furthermore, lets not forget the benefits that this development would bring. It will be undoubtedly bring more vibrancy to the area around the cathedral, its green and the Cathedral Quarter in general.

Wavensmere Homes are becoming accustomed to working on sensitive sites, having recently restored both ‘Pepper Pot’ buildings at their London Road Nightingale Quarter (former DRI) site and having committed to sensitive redevelopment projects at both Friar Gate Goods Yard and Milford Mill within the Derwent Valley Mills World Heritage Site.

In the current proposal, Wavensmere, after consultation with stakeholders, have altered their proposals to something that better reflects the historic context of the site. This is an example of how heritage considerations play a part in shaping our cities. This more sympathetic approach will now complement Cathedral Green and enhance the area.

Heritage impacts, peoples’ needs and changes in socioeconomic activity have all combined to be the instigator of the developments that are taking place in Derby today. The suburbs are full but the city is hollow. Residential schemes are bringing life back to the city and, in turn, encourage more to visit the city. Lets get behind this development at Cathedral Green for the good of the city.

Artists impressions of the Cathedral Green scheme

Images: Cathedral One Full Street CGI by Wavensmere Homes and Wilson Bowden Developments

Unveiling the Impact of AI in Architecture: Navigating Tools and Innovations

AI in Architecture

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to seamlessly integrate itself into architecture, reshaping how designers, architects, and planners conceive and craft spaces. In our multidisciplinary design firm, we’ve embarked on an exploration of AI’s diverse influence within our field, delving into various AI-driven tools and methodologies to see if we can harness these for the benefit of our clients.

In the realm of text generation, AI tools like ChatGPT have shown promise, aiding in drafting articles and generating written content (including this very post!). However, when it comes to image generation for design work, tools like DALL E stand out as interesting resources. DALL E enables users to generate diverse and unique images with text-based prompts. We see these tools as being somewhat helpful to generate ideas and precedent images at the start of the design process, but there is definitely not enough control and detail to aid specific design work.

Figure 1 – DALL E text generated image, prompt; “2 storey rural red brick dwelling with bay windows and slate tile roof in an illustrative and architectural style”

AI-powered rendering software such as Veras offer more control by basing image generation on basic 3D models. Vera is a plug-in for SketchUp that can use simple base models to create varied fully detailed renders. Yet, despite the theoretical advantages, unexpected artifacts and complexities necessitate meticulous corrections, which can slow down the process.

We have had the most success so far with tools like Vizcom.ai. Vizcom can convert simple line sketches into striking visuals. Additionally, AI tools integrated into Adobe’s suite, such as generative fill in Photoshop, offer potential in improving our workflows. However, our key focus is always to create consistent and repeatable images that achieve the design intent we are looking for, which isn’t always possible with these tools.

Figure 2 – Vizcom ai visual created from line drawing. Before and after, prompt;  “rural house red brick”

Nevertheless, our core visual creation process remains rooted in established methods involving 2D and 3D CAD software such as SketchUp and Revit, coupled with rendering software like Enscape. These tools provide us with precise control over generating early-stage conceptual visuals or intricate final renderings, aligning closely with our meticulous design approach.

Another intriguing aspect of AI’s influence in architecture is generative design. We’ve explored tools like Dynamo for Revit, utilizing parameters to generate test options and forms. Autodesk’s Forma software has extended this capability, enabling the assessment of multiple iterations of site form and massing, particularly beneficial in the master planning phase for larger-scale development projects.

In our pursuit of innovation, we have a commitment to staying updated on technological advancements, continuously experimenting with AI-driven tools. However, while AI presents immense potential in reshaping architectural workflows, our approach remains grounded in time-tested practices.

As the possibilities for AI in architecture continue to expand, we’re eager to harness these advancements to further elevate our ability to craft high quality spaces. We are on the lookout for bold and ambitious clients eager to test these tools and software for their projects, collaborating to explore the possibilities and push the boundaries of what’s achievable in architecture.

David Symons, Senior Architect, Planning & Design Practice Ltd

AI in Architecture: References:

  1. ChatGPT: OpenAI’s ChatGPT
  2. DALL E: OpenAI’s DALL E
  3. Vizcom.ai: Vizcom.ai
  4. SketchUp: SketchUp
  5. Revit: Autodesk Revit
  6. Enscape: Enscape Rendering Software
  7. Dynamo for Revit: Dynamo for Revit
  8. Autodesk Forma: Autodesk Forma

Our approachable and experienced team comprises architects, architectural assistants, designers and technicians. Our architects have true international expertise having worked on large scale projects in Russia, Germany, Spain, Canada and the United States as well as across the UK. We offer a comprehensive design service through all the RIBA work stages from concept through to completion.

Planning & Design Practice believe in good architecture, to improve our quality of life, create real value and to drive sustainable development, creating robust, resilient homes and buildings to face the challenges of climate change. For a no obligation consultation to discuss your project or property, please get in touch on 01332 347371 or enquiries@planningdesign.co.uk

Retrospective planning permission

Retrospective Planning Permission

Planning & Design Practice is delighted to have assisted in securing retrospective planning permission for the installation of an oil tank associated with a recently constructive new build house.

The retrospective application related to work that had already commenced on site due to an honest error by our client who believed that planning permission was not required, as the installation of an oil tank fell within the limitations of Class E ‘buildings etc incidental to the enjoyment of a dwellinghouse’, Part 1 ‘development within the curtilage of a dwellinghouse’, of Schedule 2 of the General Permitted Development Order (2015).

However, following by the Local Planning Authority (LPA) it was advised that planning permission is required as a small part of the building is situated on land forward of the principal elevation of the original dwellinghouse.

It is first worth clarifying that the carrying out of ‘development’ (i.e. building works, material changes of use or engineering operations) without the benefit of planning permission is not, initially at least, ‘illegal’ but is better described as ‘unauthorised’. ‘Breaches of planning control’ are normally anonymously flagged by the general public to the LPA. In other words, the system is reactive – rarely do LPA’s proactively monitor compliance with planning consents.

Once a ‘breach of planning control’ has been identified the local planning authority (LPA) will often invite a landowner to submit a planning application to ‘regularise the breach’ – in other words to retrospectively obtain planning permission for development. In these circumstances, the LPA must assess the application in the same way as if it were a proposed development and not let the fact that it is a retrospective application affect the outcome either way.

If the application is approved, that is generally the end of the matter, with consent issued subject to any relevant conditions minus, of course, the usual 3 year commencement time frame. If the application is refused, however, the landowner then has the option to appeal the decision or rectify the breach of planning control (i.e. to correct the unauthorised works or cease the unauthorised use).

In most cases, we recommend that you appeal against the Enforcement Notice. We can help prepare, manage and submit your appeal. For more information on our enforcement service click here.

Andrew Stock, Associate Director – Chartered Town Planner, Planning & Design Practice Ltd

Building Stability within the Green Belt

Stability in the green belt

Planning & Design Practice are pleased to announce that they have successfully secured planning permission for a new stable building within the Green Belt, a positive result for our client having been achieved.

The new stable building is intended for equestrian use and will help create a better quality of life and environment for the horses on the site. It will provide much needed storage space for hay and associated equipment to cater for the newly acquired use for the site. The stable building is of wooden construction with Shiplap Cladding, whilst the roof is black Onduvilla tiles.

Before the construction of this stable building the site consisted of one agricultural field with no notable obstructions to the Green Belt in terms of buildings. As this site is within the Green Belt this did pose the complication of having to prove the building is necessary to cater for the horses on the site. This was unavoidable as the Council wouldn’t approve the construction of a building within the Green Belt without compelling evidence that it is essential for the new equestrian use of the site. As the land was previously under an agricultural use it was also necessary to apply for a Change of Use so that horses could graze on the land.

Another key aspect to this project was preserving the openness of the green belt whilst also constructing a building upon the land. To do this the building had to be linked to recreation and/or outdoor sport as part of Policy EN2.

Planning within the Green Belt

Planning Design Practice Ltd is a multi-disciplinary team comprised of Architects, Planning Consultants and Heritage specialists.

Obtaining planning permission in the countryside can bring about significant gains and help to maximise the value of your rural property. However, development in the countryside is subject to strict planning controls which can make obtaining planning permission very difficult. Our RTPI Chartered planning experts have vast experience of working on projects for homeowners, landowners and farmers in rural areas including agricultural buildings, barn conversions, Certificates of Lawfulness and farm diversification schemes.

We provide honest and sound advice, mediate when required and maintain high professional standards. We aim to build strong and lasting relationships with our clients and we are always pleased to work with architects and other professional companies.

For a free, no obligation consultation to discuss your project, please don’t hesitate to get in touch on 01332 347371 or enquiries@planningdesign.co.uk.

Samuel Young, Assistant Planner, Planning & Design Practice Ltd

Arguing history with a Chat Bot

PDP_Chat Bot

A recent exchange between our Heritage Consultant Ruth Gray, and an AI chat bot revealed that artificial intelligence may not know all the facts! Read on to find out more!

I am the heritage consultant for planning & design and my job is to reveal the significance of heritage assets and report on the impact a development may have on a heritage asset. Facts are very important to our reports as key decisions will be based on them. I was curious as to the uses I could put an AI chat bot app to in my work and what I found was alarming! I asked it a simple question:

Me:‘ Tell me about John Smedley Mills is it still open?’

It answered with this;

‘Smedley’s Mill today provides apartment living, office units, workshops, restaurants, shops and communal areas. Parts of the river were restored to create an attractive waterfront environment. The regeneration honoured the mill’s textile heritage.’

This surprised me because the river not next to John Smedley Mills Lea Brook runs beside it my local knowledge told me that. So, I asked it something else;

Me: ‘Isn’t John Smedley the longest running knitwear factory in the world?’

It replied:

‘Yes, you’re absolutely right. The John Smedley mill in Lea Bridge, Derbyshire had the notable distinction of being the longest continuously operating knitwear factory in the world when it finally closed in 2003.’

Closed? I know for a fact it isn’t closed! So I asked it something else;

Me: ‘It’s still open at Lea bridge making knitwear?’

Chat bot: ‘No, you’re right, I misspoke earlier – the original John Smedley knitwear factory at Lea Bridge is no longer operating.’

Anyway, after a lot of back and forth with this ill-informed chat bot I copied and pasted direct information from John Smedley’s current website and its reply was:

‘I clearly had outdated information suggesting the Lea Bridge factory had closed. Thank you again for pointing this out – I’ve updated my knowledge and recognize John Smedley maintains production at this iconic long-running knitwear mill. Please let me know if I can clarify or expand on this correction.’

You can rest assured I will not be using AI generated information in any heritage reports for Planning & Design! Our heritage reports use a combination of historic map data, first hand written evidence, the local historic environment record along with site visits and any other verified information including historic photo images. We present the facts as they are and these help inform the decisions as well as the designs of new developments and projects.

Chat Bot – past, present and future

AI will undoubtedly have its place in our lives in the future but beware of what it can also do to our past! For the moment it is still learning as is evidenced by my recent conversation with it above it only knows what it drags from the web. A lot of our history is still in archives and is still with the locals in their attics! AI hasn’t got all the information ………..yet!

John Smedley is very much still open and thriving after we secured planning permission in December 2015. We were instructed as planning consultants to deliver a complex set of proposals for redevelopment, conversion and part demolition on a site at Lea Mills part of the John Smedley factory. The ‘East Site’ was no longer needed for garment manufacture and development was needed to secure a beneficial future use for the land and buildings and to support the company’s development and expansion. The company also had three listed cottages at risk which were in a poor state of repair and needed to be refurbished and brought back into residential use. You can find out more about the project at this link.

If you have any projects in mind with a heritage element do get in touch with the team here at Planning & Design. This article was written by a human!

RTPI Young Planners’ Conference 2023

PDP_RTPI Young Planners Conference 2023

On Friday 13th and Saturday 14th October, hundreds of Young Planners, including three from the Planning & Design Practice team flocked to Birmingham to attend the annual Young Planners’ Conference, which this year was hosted by the RTPI West Midlands Young Planners Committee. Each year, the conference focuses on a theme; this year the topic was “Planning for Legacy: Regeneration and Place in the West Midlands.”

Over the two days, a number of talks hosted by different speakers and sponsors took place. These talks ranged from how master planning can be used to promote a legacy, and how transport infrastructure can unlock regeneration to the use of green infrastructure, biodiversity net gain, and how planning can be used to influence health outcomes. Each talk was chaired by one of the West Midlands Young Planners Committee members, and hosted a panel of different speakers who are specialists in their own fields. Each speaker provided a short presentation, which provided a different insight into the topic, and allowed for an interesting Q&A with the audience.

As well as the talks, the conference also included six study tours, which each delegate attending had the opportunity to go to one. Three of these tours were: Perry Barr – A Lasting Legacy Study Tour; Built heritage and regeneration in Birmingham’s Jewellery Quarter; Work/live/play by the water: leverage Birmingham’s canal network.

Last year, Birmingham hosted the Commonwealth Games. After stepping in to host the games, after Durban pulled out in 2018, Birmingham’s Alexander Stadium in Perry Bar was to be one of the main venues for the games, hosting the Opening and Closing Ceremonies as well as the athletics events. The stadium was completely transformed into a world class sporting venue. The improvements to Alexander Stadium have also seen enhanced facilities for the local community and new teaching space for Birmingham City University. The Games have acted as a catalyst for the regeneration of Perry Barr. The athletes village was located within Perry Barr, which has now been transformed into thousands of new homes, 30% of which are to be affordable. This has been supported by a new and improved railway station and bus interchange nearby, allowing people plentiful opportunity to commute into Birmingham in a more sustainable manner.

PDP Young Planners

The tour around Birmingham’s Jewellery Quarter showed how Birmingham has embraced the heritage of the city whilst also looking towards the future. The Jewellery Quarter is home to over 700 jewellers and independent retailers, and is considered to include the most extensive group of Victorian and 20th century buildings devoted to jewellery manufacture and small goods in Europe. One of these is the Coffin Works, a museum which focuses on the previous manufacturing of coffin plates that took place there. As well as the museum, the courtyard is home to a collection of independent manufacturers and retailers. The tour allowed us to look around this interesting collection of businesses that are helping bring economic growth to the area whilst also retaining key heritage assets. This also has promoted the creation of new communities that thrive on social enterprise.

The canal network tour began in the east of the city near Birmingham City University, highlighting the integration of the canal network within modern urban development. We travelled west through the inner city towpaths, exploring the stark contrast between underused, underdeveloped areas and the newly developed, cleaner, brighter towpaths. This provided an insight into the city’s historic and industrial heritage, highlighting its major role in transporting coal, iron and other heavy goods. It also emphasised the city’s successful efforts to transform these industrial, previously undesirable spaces into ideal locations for modern, inner-city housing. The standout development, Port Loop by Urban Splash, was a focal point of the canal boat tour around the west of the city. The development is circled by a kilometre of historic canal, delivering new public green spaces; a leisure centre; an Art House for residents and the local community; and 100 new homes, in what was once an undesirable area of Birmingham to live. Overall, the tour greatly illustrated Birmingham’s journey from an industrial past to a modern city with a focus on communities, green spaces and culture.

The conference was an invaluable opportunity for Young Planners to learn more about key planning issues, engage in discussions and network with familiar faces and make new connections within the industry. We are looking forward to the 2024 Conference in Cambridge!

Permission secured for Peak District barn

Planning & Design_Peak District Barn

Planning & Design Practice are pleased to announce that planning permission has been secured for the erection of an agricultural building in the Peak District National Park. The building will allow our client to store their tractor securely, complimenting the existing rural business.

In line with our clients brief our Architectural Team, in collaboration with our team of RTPI accredited Town Planners, prepared a scheme that would sit comfortably within the Peak District landscape whilst also considering the rural surroundings of the site. The scheme took into consideration the potential impact on the character of the area and the beauty that the national park offers. These considerations informed the final scheme and the siting of the barn.

The proposed building will be steel framed, with concrete blocks infilling the steel and externally covered in timber. The timber cladding will be vertical and stained dark brown. The roof will include clear panels to allow natural light into the barn. The location of the barn was chosen as it will be sited adjacent to an existing tree line, helping to integrate it into the landscape.

The agricultural building will store a tractor and other agricultural machinery. A tractor and associated equipment (eg mowers, baler, trailer) are needed for hay making, topping and practices relating to the sheep. The tractor is also a vital tool in general maintenance on the farm for example hedging, fencing and wall repairs.

Planning in the Peak District National park

Due to the natural beauty that the Peak District offers, gaining planning permission can be difficult if certain factors are not considered and given sufficient attention during the design phase. Within the National Park, factors such as the proposed design, materials and location within the landscape should always consider what the potential impact could be. These initial details should always be discussed with Clients early on, so any potential hurdles that could occur have been thoroughly considered and subsequently avoided or mitigated.”

Planning & Design Practice Ltd is a multi-disciplinary team of Chartered Town Planners, Architects, Architectural Assistants and Heritage Specialists. Gaining planning permission is a key step in almost any development. We can take a project through from inception to completion, but we also offer the flexibility to engage a client’s own architects and provide a planning service, whilst our design team can also work with clients who have engaged other town planning professionals.

Planning & Design Practice Ltd are well versed in researching and understanding local Council’s policies to ensure the best possible case if put forward for our clients.

For a free, no obligation consultation to discuss your project, please don’t hesitate to get in touch on 01332 347371 or enquiries@planningdesign.co.uk.

Shaun Hyde, Planner, Planning & Design Practice Ltd

High-Rise: The changing face of Derby – the sky’s the limit?

PDP_Derby High-Rise

Proposals for high-rise development in Derby city centre are once again attracting attention and controversy, write Richard Pigott and Megan Askham of Planning & Design Practice. The source of the latest controversy comes in the form of Derbion’s plans for the demolition of the Eagle Market building, public house and Derby Theatre, and the erection of a phased mixed-use development; and a separate application to demolish Bradshaw Way Retail Park and build five buildings for housing, commercial premises and office space. Perhaps the most eye-catching element was an apartment block that would be up to 29 storeys high.

The plans received the Council’s backing after seven out of ten councillors voted in favour of the proposals. But the plans must now be referred to the Government due to an objection made by Historic England (HE) who have been critical of the scheme. If the Government approves, Derbion will be able to press ahead with more detailed plans in due course.

Well, these are the headlines anyway, but we were curious to examine the concerns raised by HE, and examine how they were addressed by the council as well as gauge local opinion on what effect these proposals might have. The application is in outline only (detailed designs to follow) but some fairly detailed 3D visuals have been produced, providing an indication of what the development could entail.

Figure 1: Illustrative Masterplan
Figure 2: 3D Visuals
Figure 3: 3D Visuals

Historic England, as a statutory consultee, provided a detailed response, raising concerns about the impact on the setting of the Derwent Valley Mills World Heritage Site (DVMWHS), a number of listed buildings and conservation areas. For those who may not be familiar with the term, setting is defined as “the surroundings in which a heritage asset is experienced”, hence it can extend well beyond the asset’s physical structure and immediate surroundings. As part of any planning proposal, it is always necessary to determine what impact a proposal might have on the setting of heritage assets.

HE’s objections can be summarized as:

  • Adverse impact on DVMWHS by virtue of harmful impact on the skyline, townscape and scale of the surroundings from the vicinity of the Silk Mill at the southern end of the WHS
  • Adverse impact on the Grade I Cathedral Church of All Saints, by virtue of the outline proposal having the potential to compete with the prominence of the Cathedral tower as a key historic and cultural landmark
  • Adverse impact on the Friar Gate Conservation Area by virtue of acting as a highly visible and jarring new addition to powerful vistas from the Conservation Areas towards the city centre
  • Adverse impact on the City Centre Conservation Area as the outline proposals will have a high impact on powerful vistas
  • Ignoring the Tall Buildings Study, which recommends a building of no more than 12 storeys on the site, with the proposal for a tower of well over twice this height, thus eroding the Derby skyline and changing the character of the cityscape.

In response to these concerns, the planning officer’s report stated that:

  • Given the scale and height of the proposed development and its impact on the city’s skyline, there is a potential for the development to have an impact on a number of designated and non-designated heritage assets that reside within the site’s wider context
  • With respect to the DVMWHS, consideration must also be given to the other heritage assets in the vicinity of the site. From longer-range views, one can appreciate the land levels of the city and the elevated position of the historic core, therefore, given the scale of the proposal, the taller elements of the development will be visible from above the townscape.
  • The development would protrude above the skyline along Friar Gate which is a direct result of the height of the tallest blocks rather than the proposed development as a whole. However, consideration should be given to the changing land levels.
  • The majority of heritage assets are located to the west of the application site and there will be a clear interaction between the development and these assets, including Conservation Areas and listed buildings
  • The heritage consultees echo each other’s concerns that the development will have a degree of harm, some stating that this would be a considerable degree of harm to the heritage assets. The development would also dramatically alter the character of the cityscape, forming a key part of the setting of these heritage assets.

The officer report concluded that there would be some harm to heritage assets but that the public benefits would outweigh this harm.

This application provides further evidence of HE’s position as an influential consultee with the power to delay and potentially prevent development where they identify heritage harm.

In the specific case of Derby, the Tall Buildings Study does identify key views and vistas although these are meant to assist with planning decisions rather than being ‘protected views’ as such.

High-rise and heritage

All cities are patchworks of architectural styles that reflect the changing fortunes and aspirations of a place. At a recent Marketing Derby event there was talk of a “renaissance” for Derby. Redevelopment schemes at Becketwell, the Nightingale Quarter (formerly Derbyshire Royal Infirmary) and the University Business School are well under way. Also in the pipeline are plans for Friar Gate Goods Yard, itself within the Friar Gate Conservation Zone. City centres are changing, and many would argue that Derby needs to move with the times. One issue we see, however, is the apparent disconnect between what heritage professionals or the ‘heritage lobby’ deem to be ‘harmful’ and what the general public feels. Furthermore, heritage professionals will often equate change with harm whereas this is far less likely to be the case amongst the general public, where progress is often seen as a ‘good thing’.

The heritage of our city is reflected and preserved successfully with schemes such as the restoration of the Victorian Market Hall and the success of the Museum of Making, showcasing our industrial heritage whilst also looking ahead. Sensitive repurposing of heritage assets such as the Old Post Office have resulted in a modern facilities like CUBO Work that address modern business and lifestyle needs.

Tall buildings are synonymous with cities and, if Derby wants to be taken seriously as a 21st century city then our skyline needs to reflect that. Over the past century Derby has in fact lost a number of tall buildings that accompanied the loss of its manufacturing industries, as its city centre changed in the early 20th century. Cities also need to densify in order to meet the need for more housing and to breathe new life into our cities. Whilst it remains to be seen whether 29 storeys is an appropriate scale of development, this is matter to be considered at the reserved matters stage when the detailed design and siting of the building can be properly assessed. We do, however, welcome opportunities for development that enhance and complement our heritage, creating a modern, vibrant city, that attracts new residents, visitors and businesses alike.

Megan Askham is a Planner and Richard Pigott is a Director at Planning & Design Practice Ltd.

All Images: Derbion/Leonard Design Architects

GET IN TOUCH