Urban Design – A tool for change?

PDP_Urban Design

As a society we need to take the power to create change. Jonathan Jenkin, Consultant at Planning & Design Practice sets out how Urban Design can be a tool to facilitate this ambition.

What is urban design? This is the description on Wikipedia:

‘many assume urban design is about the process of designing and shaping the physical features of cities, and regional spaces, it is also about social design and other larger scale issues. Linking the fields of architecture as well as planning to better organize physical space and community environments.’

In its true sense urban design is about designing and shaping the physical features of our towns, villages, and cities to allow us to meet our social and environmental goals.

In its very essence it is a socialist idea where the people come together to design and build their own environment that better meets their own needs and those of future generations. In the face of the climate crisis, environmental degradation including poor water and air quality, increases in poverty, a health crisis caused by obesity, international conflict, and reductions in our commitment to community and society the challenge, for us as a society is greater than it has ever been, and urban design should be seen as a tool for real change.

We say we want to create beautiful places, which promotes social development, provide us as citizens with places to live, work, learn and be taken care of, which is integrated into the natural environment and promotes biodiversity.

But we do not give ourselves the tools to do this. We are dictated to by the needs of those who control the market in goods and services and the commoditisation of basic needs such as housing. In the last 40 years privatisations and the mantra of allowing the market to decide has emasculated the idea of community action in the pursuit of social and environmental goals. Capitalism should serve society and the environment unfortunately society has become the servant of those who control capital, and the environment is used by capital with little or no account given to its value. We need to regain control over many aspects of our lives. For a truly sustainable future we need to build social and environmental capital so that it can lead and direct capital to where it best serves our society and environment.

We need to make this change and to do so now, or the outlook for our children and grandchildren is truly bleak. We have to learn to live well within tight environmental limits while being able to meet our own goals and aspirations within a wider society.

To live well our basic needs must be met. We need good healthy food, we need good housing, a high-quality education system, a vibrant cultural life, an effective health system and rewarding jobs. All this within a clean and biodiverse environment where environmental capital is built and developed, paving the way for an even better world.

To start we need to plan for the long term. A national plan that sets out the baseline conditions and what we need to change for a sustainable society and community. This national plan should be a key battle ground where we as a nation agree the steps that have to be made and the time frame in which the necessary changes are brought about. Our aims for a better society and a better world for our children should be followed through at the regional and local level through elected representatives and our own involvement. We can as a society set our own standards, that private companies have to meet if they want to compete in our social market.

We can use urban design to create the physical framework of our better world. This starts of by looking at the baseline conditions of our own settlements and towns. Identifying what we have and what we need to change and accommodate. A thirty-year plan with clear goals, open to change, but with a set of basic conditions that have to be met. These basic conditions could include standards for housing for all, access to education, access to health services, the supply of good food, emission standards, air and water quality standards and the development of environmental resilience.

We should have the freedom to design and build places where they are needed not just on land that owners want to see developed. We need the power to develop and to protect. We need to protect the past but also, we need to create new stories and new histories. We need to build environmental capital, so that we can live in balance with the carrying capacity of our world and this requires radical change.

A multi-faceted approach to urban design, developed within with a clear set of social an environmental objective will help us to create a new more sustainable physical world where we have different but better, more fulfilled, and healthier lives. Using urban design powerfully is a tool for radical change.

As a society we need to take the power to create change. By doing this we take back control allowing us to make a real difference to our own and others’ lives.

Jonathan Jenkin, Consultant, Planning & Design Practice Ltd

Main Image: Damstead Park – Alfreton

PDP secured outline planning consent for up to 149 dwellings, public open space and wildlife areas at land off Each Well Lane, Alfreton, Derbyshire.

Planning & Design celebrate 20 years

PDP_Celebrating 20 Years

Planning & Design Practice are celebrating their Emerald anniversary in May 2022, having achieved 20 years of success in providing town planning services, architectural expertise and specialised heritage advice.

Founded in May 2002 by Jonathan Jenkin, Planning & Design Practice has since forged an excellent reputation for winning approvals and for creating attractive and sustainable proposals. Comprising RTPI Chartered town planners and RIBA Chartered Architects, the company has generated over £200m of uplift in land values for clients through its consents and proposals over the years.

In July 2021 Jonathan sold his stake in the business but retains an active role in the company as a Consultant. Specialist Conservation Architect Lindsay Cruddas and Chartered Town Planner Michael Bamford joined Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI) Chartered Town Planners Richard Pigott and Jon Millhouse as Directors. This diversification of the board represented both our increasing architectural ambition and the continuing growth of our Sheffield office.

Jonathan Jenkin, Consultant said “I am immensely proud of what we have achieved over the past twenty years, the clients we have helped and the problems we have solved and continue to solve. In the end our work is about problem solving, understanding our client’s needs, and providing a bridge between the client and the Local Planning Authority.”

Richard Pigott, Director, says “The team continues to evolve with the development of our architectural team now that we are an RIBA Chartered Practice, the growth of our Sheffield office and the success of our heritage team. Whilst building on our expertise and experience in rural development we are increasingly working on major high profile projects as well. Our aim is to build on and enhance the reputation established over the last 20 years.”

The architectural side of the business boasts true international expertise, with our team of RIBA Chartered Architects and Architectural Assistants having worked on large scale projects across Europe and the United States as well as in the UK. The company is able to design award winning proposals for a wide range of clients across the country.

During our 20 years of business, we have worked with a diverse range of clients including landowners, existing business owners, farmers and other architects including Matthew Montague, John Smedleys Ltd, Chevin Homes, Derby and Burton University Hospitals Trust, Evans Vettori, Derbyshire County Council, Elvaston Castle and Garden Trust, Callow Hall – Wildhive, Meadowview Homes, and Microsoft Rare Ltd.

Recently, following a Public Inquiry, we secured outline planning permission for an extension to Denby Hall Business Park, one of the largest permissions of its kind which secured the retention of 100 jobs and the creation of a further 680 new jobs in a significant boost to the local economy of Amber Valley.

Our heritage work was recognised and awarded the Highly Commended Certificate for Excellence in Planning for Heritage & Culture at the 2019 and 2021 RTPI East Midlands Awards for Planning Excellence, for our work on the redevelopment of the ‘East Site’ at John Smedley Mills, Lea Bridge and the redevelopment of Ambergate Social Club respectively. We were recently appointed as Heritage Planning Consultants by Elvaston Castle and Garden Trust, in partnership with Derbyshire County Council for the proposed £35 million restoration and transformation of the in the 321-acre Derbyshire estate.

Comprising RTPI Chartered town planners, RIBA Chartered Architects and architectural assistants, plus heritage specialists, Planning & Design Practice are headquartered in Derby, with offices in Sheffield as well as Matlock and Macclesfield. For more information, or to discuss your own project please get in touch.

Appeals – Case studies

PDP_Appeals case Studies

As the following case studies illustrate, at Planning & Design Practice we are vastly experienced in the appeals process and know how to present your case in the best possible way and bring all relevant factors to the attention of the Inspector to maximise the chances of success.

The following case studies provide a flavour of the breadth of appeals we have dealt with over the last 5 years or so, for both residential and commercial clients.

Land to the west of Denby Hall Business Park, Denby, Ripley DE5 8LE; Public Inquiry; Appeal reference – APP/M1005/W/20/3265602

We acted as expert planning witness at a Public Inquiry relating to a refused application for 3 large commercial/industrial units at Denby Hall Business Park. The council had refused the application due to the site’s Green Belt location but the Inspector concluded that “the conflict with the development plan policies is clearly outweighed by the social, economic and environmental benefits in favour of the appeal proposal.”

Read more HERE

Brailsford Meadow, Risley Lane, Breaston DE72 3TT | Informal hearing | Appeal reference –APP/N1025/C/19/3238932 and 3238933

This was a complex appeal against an enforcement notice issued by the council which sought the complete demolition of a barn converted to a dwelling using Class Q permitted development rights. Whilst the Inspector felt that the building operations undertaken went beyond what could reasonably be described as a ‘conversion’, she concluded that our explanation of events and reasoning that led to the dwelling as built amounted to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development in the Green Belt.


Oaklands, 103 Duffield Road, Derby, Derbyshire DE22 1AE | Written Representations | Appeal reference – APP/C1055/W/16/3150234

This was a proposal for the change of use of a D1 clinic to a house, demolition of former coach house and construction of 9 terraced houses and associated access within the grounds for our client Meadowview Homes. There was a strong heritage focus to this appeal as the site lay in the Strutts Park Conservation Area and the buffer zone of the Derwent Valley Mills World Heritage Site but the Inspector accepted that the scheme was sympathetic to the character of the designated heritage assets and would.

Read more HERE

PDP_Oaklands Duffield Road Derby

Averill Farm, Evershill Lane, Morton, ALFRETON, DE55 6HB | Written Representations | Appeal reference – APP/C1055/W/16/3150234

Planning permission was secured for the construction of an innovative timber drying facility and associated storage facilities at a farm. With the help of a comprehensive Noise Impact Assessment and a landscape and visual appraisal we were able to demonstrate that there would be no adverse impacts in this rural location.

Read more HERE

75 Derby Road, Hilton, Derby DE65 5FP | Written Representations | Appeal reference – APP/F1040/W/20/3246651

Planning permission and a partial award of costs was secured at appeal for the construction of 9 light industrial/office buildings in place of a house and nursery buildings. The Inspector gave the council’s concerns about the impact on character and appearance and highway safety short shrift and agreed that the scheme was well designed and would sit comfortably within its context.

Hayes Gate Farm, Star Bank, Oakamoor, Staffordshire ST10 3BN | Written Representations | Appeal reference – APP/B3438/W/18/3202031

Another Class Q case, this one related to a building which the council stated was not convertible to a dwelling. However, the Inspector accepted that internal works carried out prior to the application did not require planning permission, that the proposal met the criteria in Class Q and that the development would improve the appearance of the building relative to its current form.

Often seen as a dark art shrouded in secrecy, Planning & Design Practice has 20 years experience of successfully achieving positive planning decisions. Our Director Richard Pigott demystifies the process with some key facts about what you can expect when you seek to challenge a council’s decision., in this companion article “Appeals – A beginners guide.”

If you have had planning permission refused or would like to discuss your options or chances at appeal please get in contact for a free no obligation discussion.

Appeals – a beginners guide

Planning & Design_Appeals

The planning appeals process is often seen as something of a dark art shrouded in secrecy. Here, our Director Richard Pigott seeks to demystify the process with some key facts about what you can expect when you seek to challenge a council’s decision.

Planning appeals are decided by the Planning Inspectorate (PINs), an independent governmental body based in Bristol but with Inspectors based all over the country.

Appeals are typically lodged by an applicant against the refusal of planning permission, although it is also possible to appeal against specific planning conditions on an approval. In fact, you don’t actually have to wait for the council to make a decision before you lodge an appeal – if the application is not determined within the statutory time frame (8 weeks for householder and minor applications and 13 weeks for major applications) you can appeal against non-determination of the application. However, you should think twice before doing so as appeals are not a quick option – they generally take 4-6 months to decide. But if you know which direction the application is heading you can effectively take matters out of the council’s hands and leave it to PINs to decide.

There are 3 types of appeal procedures: written representations; an informal hearing; and an inquiry.

It is possible to request a particular procedure, although PINs will ultimately decide on the most appropriate procedure based upon a number of criteria.

Most appeals will be decided by way of written representations, with only the more complex and/or controversial appeals being determined by hearings or inquiries. The informal hearing takes the form of a round the table discussion led by the Inspector whereas the format of a Public Inquiry is more adversarial and legal representation in the form of a barrister is often sought. A benefit of these processes is that they provide opportunities for presentation and discussion of the evidence from both the Council and the appellant and 3rd party expert witnesses can be invited. Thus, your credibility as appellant and the positive aspects of a project can be promoted to best effect. It follows, therefore, that appeal costs can ramp up significantly, particularly for a public inquiry.

Something we are often asked by clients is whether they will get their costs back if they win the appeal. Parties in planning appeals normally meet their own expenses and costs do not, as a rule, follow the result. However, where a party has:

– (1) behaved unreasonably; and
– (2) this has directly caused another party to incur unnecessary or wasted expense, they may be subject to an award of costs.

In practice, examples where costs may be awarded include, inter alia, failure to substantiate a stated reason for refusal; Planning Authorities clearly failing to have regard to government policy or its own adopted policies; Appellants pursuing a clear ‘no hope’ case; Late withdrawal of an appeal, late cancellation of an event or late cancellation of an enforcement notice.

Another question we are often asked is what are the chances of success at appeal? For householder appeals in 2021/22, 36% of appeals were allowed. For all other appeals (excluding enforcement and listed building appeals) the figures for 2021/22 show that the percentage of appeals allowed was 28% for written representations, 37% for hearings and 55% for inquiries. Nationally the average success rate is around 36% of all appeals, although this varies significantly depending on the type of appeal.

It is clear, therefore, that the chances of success improve significantly when the appellant is able to put their case more extensively and persuasively at a hearing or inquiry. It is, however, also fair to say that a well-argued case will significantly improve one’s chances of success whichever procedure an appeal follows. At PDP we pride ourselves on doing exactly this and in this link will showcase some case studies which illustrate the breadth of our appeals experience.

Richard Pigott, Director – Chartered Town Planner, Planning & Design Practice Ltd

The window is opening for protected species surveys

Protected Species

We share our buildings and spaces with other animals and with plants (including trees). On many potential development sites, both residential and commercial, many animals and plants are protected species and the Council needs to know what is there and the means of protection or mitigation.

Protected species include bats, badgers, reptiles, amphibians, birds, and plants. In preparing a planning application, where protected species are likely to exist; protected species surveys have to be prepared by an ecologist or a recognised expert and submitted as part of a planning application.

These surveys can only be done at the right time of year. Great Crested Newts became the poster boy for delay in the planning system because the window for undertaking a Great Crested Newt (GCN) survey is noticeably short. For example, an eDNA GCN survey the window is mid-April to the middle of June.

This means that if an application is submitted in July but without a required eDNA survey, a decision on the application would be delayed for a year and for many councils, a planning application would not be validated unless accompanied by the survey.

On sites with multiple protected species, surveys have to be done at the right time of year. This needs forward planning and can extend the preparation period for a planning application.

For example, a former quarry development site containing a badger sett, some derelict buildings, areas suitable for reptiles and two ponds.

The following surveys will be required:

  • A badger survey – (any time throughout the year)
  • eGCN survey (mid-April to mid-June)
  • An amphibian survey (May to September)
  • A bat emergence survey (three visits May to September)
  • Breeding birds (March to July)
  • A reptile survey (March to October).
  • Plant habitat surveys – (May to September)

Spring is the best time of year for multiple surveys, and it is important to get these surveys in place when you can. Please note that ecologists are very busy at key times of the year and will need to be booked well in advance.

This issue is likely to become even more important as this country commits itself to improving biodiversity and the planned uplift in biodiversity on larger development sites.

Jonathan Jenkin, Consultant, Planning & Design Practice Ltd

Planning permission for new Sheffield apartments

PDP_Student Development Sheffield

Planning & Design Practice is delighted to have secured planning permission for 8 apartments on land at Cross Street, Sheffield. The proposed development includes the erection of a two-storey building and the extension and change of use of an existing two-storey building, as well a bin/bike store, parking area, landscaping, and outdoor space.

The application site is located on the eastern side of the Market Square in Woodhouse shopping centre, which is defined in the Sheffield Unitary Development Plan as a ‘District Centre’. A mixed-use area comprising of a range of commercial uses on the ground floor, and residential uses on the upper floors. The existing buildings on the site are 2 and 3 storey stone faced domestic style, dating from the 18th and 19th centuries. The site is set back approximately 15m off Cross Street and elements of the site are within the ‘District Centre’ designation.

The development seeks to make effective use of brownfield land in a sustainable location close to a range of services and facilities. The design of the site establishes a strong sense of place along Church Lane whilst optimising the potential of the site to accommodate and sustain an appropriate amount / mix of development to support local facilities and transport networks; creating a development that is safe, inclusive, and accessible by design.

The Planning Officer concluded that residential development would “not prejudice the dominance of preferred retail uses” in the District Shopping Centre and would “assist the aims of the Core Strategy in providing new homes in a sustainable, brownfield location, within an existing centre, at an appropriate density”. Given that Sheffield City Council is currently unable to demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply, the “tilted balance” set out in the National Planning Policy Framework was applied and the officer attributed significant weight to the contribution the proposal would make to the supply of homes in Sheffield.

With an office at the Workstation, and with numerous clients and projects in the area we are proud to have a close connection with Sheffield. Please get in touch for advice on local planning & development.

Planning & Design become a RIBA Chartered Practice

A RIBA Chartered Practice logo over a building that our architects have designed

Planning & Design Practice are pleased to announce that they have been recognised as a RIBA Chartered architectural practice. The Royal Institute of British Architects is a global professional membership body driving excellence in architecture.

RIBA Chartered practices are the only architectural practices endorsed and promoted by the Royal Institute of British Architects. This accreditation sends a strong signal to clients, employees and the wider construction industry and shows that the practice is committed to excellence in design and service delivery.

At Planning & Design Practice we believe in good architecture, to improve our quality of life, create real value and to drive sustainable development, creating robust, resilient homes and buildings to face the challenges of climate change.

Our approachable and experienced team comprises Architects, Architectural Assistants, designers and technicians.

The team is led by Lindsay Cruddas, a RIBA accredited Specialist Conservation Architect, of which there are currently only 141 in the country. Lindsay qualified as a RIBA Chartered Architect in 2012, after receiving her degrees in Architecture at Leeds Metropolitan University, she has a specialist knowledge and interest in historic building conservation, reuse of redundant buildings and residential design.

On receiving the RIBA Chartered Status Lindsay said “We strive to gain the best outcome for our clients and design spaces that we are proud of. Becoming a RIBA Chartered Practice demonstrates that commitment to quality, service and design. I was delighted to receive the Chartered Status and proud to be developing the architectural side of the business.”

Joining Lindsay are Senior Architect Siegfried Doering (Dipl.-Ing. Architecture, AKH, ARBA) and Project Architect Manik Karunaratne (BA (Hons), MArch (Leicester), ARB).

Prior to Planning & Design Siegfried was Senior Architect/Project Design Manager as part of a team of 25 architects and engineers, and also Quality Manager in the department for an international company offering worldwide infrastructure buildings including train stations, data centres, train/tram depots, offices and maintenance facilities.

An Architects Registration Board (ARB) UK registered architect, Manik qualified in 2018 at the University of Nottingham, following an architectural journey comprised of several universities, having studied at the University of Derby, Nottingham Trent University and De Montfort University.

Having worked on commercial architecture practices previously, Manik has experience on office buildings, high rise apartments buildings, housing developments and barn conversions. Currently he is working on a variety of vernacular and domestic projects liaising closely with clients and further developing his knowledge in heritage and conservation.

Also part of the team are Part II Architectural Assistant Tina Humphreys, a graduate of De Montfort University in Leicester with a Master’s in Architecture, who is now working towards becoming an RIBA Chartered Architect. Joseph Cattmull is our Architectural Technologist, who graduated from the University of Derby, after studying the built environment at Cambridge Regional College, and who brings an interest in listed and traditional architecture and how they can be modernised.

Continuing a tradition of encouraging and supporting emerging talent, we are also pleased to announce the recent addition to the team of Joshua Bunce and Matthew Kempster as Junior Architectural Technicians, both joined the company in 2021.

Since being founded in 2002 Planning & Design Practice Ltd has earnt an excellent reputation for winning approvals and for creating attractive and viable proposals. Comprising RTPI Chartered town planners and RIBA Chartered Architects the company has generated over £200m of uplift in land values for clients through its consents and proposals. The architectural side of the business boasts true international expertise having worked on large scale projects across Europe and the United States as well as in the UK. The company is able to design award winning proposals for a wide range of clients across the country.

The company’s heritage team can advise on listed buildings and developments in sensitive locations whilst maintaining a strong planning consultancy team. In both 2019 and 2021 our heritage work was recognised and awarded the Highly Commended Certificate for Excellence in Planning at the RTPI East Midlands Awards for Planning Excellence.

At Planning & Design we believe that good design is a crucial part of the planning process. Getting the design of a project right is critical to gaining a successful planning consent and avoiding unnecessary delay and costs.

We can help you to establish your brief and work through your design ideas, whilst bringing solutions to make your building a successful place to live or work in.

Our architectural team are based across Derby, Matlock, Macclesfield and Sheffield. For more information, or to discuss your dream project please get in touch.

The new Planning Act – Will it see the light of day?

PDP_New Planning Act

The Planning White Paper, published in August 2020, promised the biggest shake-up of the planning system since the Second World War. However, there has been a re-think following the Tories’ Amersham and Chesham by-election defeat where planning dominated the campaign, with the electorate concerned that the proposed changes would make the planning system less democratic with less opportunities for communities to participate. Jonathan Jenkin, Consultant at Planning & Design Practice takes a look at what might be in store for the Act in 2022.

There is a section within the Conservative party who loathe the planning system on ideological grounds. It is seen as one of the last bastions of socialism one that should be scrapped to allow the market in land and property to be unfettered with development rights returned to landowners.

There is another section within the Conservative party who use the planning system to protect their often-privileged way of life. Those who have paid to live in the Green belt, in conservation areas, the coast, AONBs, National Parks etc and whose property prices reflect the constraints on development in those areas. There are also those who value tradition, the way areas look, protecting old buildings and the quality of the man made townscape and landscape of town and countryside. Whether it is protecting privilege or a way of life, anti-development protest has become a middle-class activity.

The planning system has been starved of resources in the last 10 years. The system has lost expertise, few councils have conservation officers, Development Control is often poorly paid and many of the best planners now work for the private sector. Enforcement is also laxer, undermining the faith people have in the system and its fairness. This lack of resources both at local level and nationally through the appeal process has slowed the system down. In wealthy areas councillors have become more anti-development to reflect the wishes of their constituents. This leads to planning officer’s recommendations being turned down and pressure on the appeal system. This has led to calls to simplify and speed up the system. Changes to the General Permitted Development Order have become labyrinthine and have reduced the scope of the planning system to control change particularly in urban areas. This has conversely increased the anxiety of those seeking to prevent development from allowing schemes fearing future changes that cannot be controlled.

The whole system is a mess, and the first thing is that it needs proper resourcing using public money. Michael Gove is now the minister responsible; few would mourn the loss of Robert Jenrick. Michael has said that public money for public goods , but can he do this for planning?

The second is a review of the GPDO, to make it sensible.

The third is a new white paper that seeks to create a proper system of local, regional, and national plans which provide direction and purpose helping to ensure that national infrastructure and climate change goals can be delivered with levelling up through a proper appraisal of the needs of the country.

The Planning White paper of 2020 (Planning for the Future) sought to further reduce the role of planning in public life. It sought to divide and rule with areas for growth, development, and protection. It tried to give protection to the wealthy and privileged while removing controls in poorer areas as a way of meeting the ideological divide at the heart of the party. The white paper was not about what is good for the country, or the well-being of its people and it should have been.

The white paper bit the dust following the Amersham and Chesham by election. A safe conservative seat to the liberal democrats who used the fear of the loss of a functioning planning system to win the seat. In the conservative heartlands, planning matters and I hope that the new white paper will look at the national picture in England to deliver for all the people in the country a national system that is equitable to all.

The new white paper is promised sometime this year. Let’s see….

Jonathan Jenkin, Consultant, Planning & Design Practice Ltd

Heritage is not all about the past

PDP_Heritage_Past

Heritage is not all about the past, we live with examples of buildings that can teach us lessons about new ways of living today. Sometimes it pays to look back at innovations designed by architects to resolve issues of their day that are also contemporary concerns, states the latest addition to our Heritage team, Ruth Gray.

For example, ventilation is currently very much on the agenda. With the Covid 19 pandemic wreaking havoc throughout the country we are again wanting methods of ventilation to ensure our patients and nurses in hospitals and schools’ children and teachers are healthy and can maintain a high standard of education. The below case studies of Planning & Design Practice projects with community buildings are a fascinating example of what can be learned from our heritage buildings.

Planning & Design Practice were commissioned by Green Square Accord on behalf of Worcestershire County Council to prepare an assessment into the heritage significance of Holyoakes Field First School and Nursery, which is situated on Bridge Street, Redditch. Whilst there is historic interest in the school being an example of the work of talented Architect Lieut.-Colonel Alfred Vernon Rowe (1880-1940) it is not his most notable or high-profile work. But our research found that the school is possibly unique for A. V. Rowe, who built many larger, multi-storied schools but these did not include Holyoakes experimental feature, the ‘marching corridors’.

The Education Act of 1907 introduced periodic medical inspections in schools to address the poor health of children across the country. This resulted in experiments in school architecture with a greater focus on light, ventilation, and provision of space indoors and outdoors for exercise. The use of single storey school buildings allowed a larger plan form, with open air verandas stretching the length of the building allowing for ‘marching corridors’, often leading to a large hall where indoor recreation could be held. Holyoakes is one example of such a plan form and having been designed in 1911 is quite early, whilst these principles had been established in the early 1900s it took some time to gain traction, being adopted nationwide after WW1. Read more about this aspect of school design here. 1

Planning & Design Practice recent research of Outwoods House as part of their assessment into the heritage significance for a project with University Hospitals of Derby and Burton (UHDB) NHS Foundation Trust, found that the original part of Outwoods House was constructed in 1895 from brick and sandstone dressings in a gothic revival style. The original building was purpose built as part of an isolation hospital, which has historic significance and modern-day resonance. The Isolation Hospitals Act (1893) enabled County Councils either to provide isolation hospitals or compel local authorities within the county to do so. From the early 1890s to 1914 some 300 local authority isolation hospitals were built. Hospitals were large, dominated by parallel rows of detached ward blocks linked by a covered way, in an extreme form of the pavilion plan that even provided distinctive ventilated basements to allow the free movement of air beneath the wards.

We discovered that overall, whilst buildings of this age/type are not uncommon, and the building has been subject to some alteration/ extension, the original core is a reasonably good example of its type (architecturally speaking) and there is historic interest deriving from its links to the hospital and the story of healthcare in the area. Read more about Isolation hospitals in Historic England’s Health and Welfare Buildings document here. 2

Neither of these case studies are listed buildings but Holyoakes school is potentially eligible for categorisation as a “non-designated heritage asset” by the local authority and Outwoods House is identified by the council’s conservation officer as a non-designated heritage asset. Meaning their importance is recognised for the role they can play in providing future generations solutions. Essentially heritage buildings can help us to understand the society of former eras through their architecture, architects, and their ideas. By understanding our heritage, we can prepare for the future. These two buildings that we have discussed are commonplace but were both designed with ventilation in mind they are examples also of why heritage assessments are an important part of the planning process as the collaboration between conservation officers, planners and developers means that we can retain and reuse buildings and, in the process, discover and retain key pieces of our heritage.

At Planning & Design Practice, we recognise the importance of the built heritage in our towns, villages and rural areas. Our Heritage team includes Director Jon Millhouse, who is a Full Member of the Institute of Historic Building Conservation, Architectural team leader Lindsay Cruddas, a registered Specialist Conservation Architect and Heritage Assistant Ruth Gray who recently completed a Masters in Public History and Heritage at the University of Derby. For more information on the heritage services we offer, or for a free, no obligation consultation to discuss your project or property, please don’t hesitate to get in touch to find out how we can help.

1: Elain Harwood’s book ‘England’s Schools: History, architecture and adaptation’ (English Heritage 2010)

2: Historic England’s book ‘Health and Welfare Buildings

2021 – a year in review: Looking ahead to 2022

PDP_Happy New Year 2022

As 2021 draws to a close, Richard Pigott, Director of Planning & Design Practice looks back to review what has certainly been an interesting year, and looks ahead to the opportunities of 2022.

It’s been another eventful year in the world of the built environment and, closer to home, for Planning & Design itself. The appetite to develop land and buildings or, for many people, make better use of what we have has led to continued strong demand for planning and architectural services.

The Planning White Paper, published in August 2020, promised the biggest shake-up of the planning system since the Second World War. However, there has been a re-think following the Tories’ Chesham and Amersham by-election defeat where planning dominated the campaign, with the electorate concerned that the proposed changes would make the planning system less democratic with less opportunities for communities to participate. There is a general consensus that the system needs to change but a good place to start would be to better fund local planning departments. They have struggled to cope with the perfect storm of ever-tightening purse strings, Covid-related impacts on working schedules and practices and a significant upturn in numbers of planning applications, meaning decision timescales are impossible to predict.

After the pandemic in 2020 (and, alas, this seemingly never-ending story has a few more chapters to run), perhaps the biggest news story of 2021 has been the climate emergency. Whilst we, in the UK, are not on the frontline of extreme weather it is affecting our lives right here, right now. The debate reached a fever pitch when the UK hosted the 26th UN Climate Change Conference of the Parties (COP26) in Glasgow in the autumn. But how did the conference perform? Is 1.5 (degrees) still alive? And do we now have reason to be optimistic on climate change? According to the general consensus, some significant gains were made but they were not as game changing as many hoped for. This is perhaps not surprising when the leaders of two of the biggest emitters, China and Russia, did not even attend the conference. As COP26 drew to a close, warming of under 2 degrees is potentially in reach, and almost 90 per cent of global emissions are now covered by a net-zero target.

At a policy level, whilst some local planning authorities are adopting their own supplementary planning documents on tackling climate change, Local Plans are often weak or sometimes even silent on the matter and its disappointing to see how little the revised version of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) addressed the climate emergency when it was published in July. This is out of step with public opinion – latest opinion polling by Opinium shows that 66% of people are in favour of connecting planning rules to climate change targets, so that all new development needs to pass tests to make sure they are environmentally friendly. Furthermore, first-hand experience tells me that local councillors are now considering the issue in virtually every decision they make. So, there are clear signs that the political will to ‘do something’ at the local level is gathering momentum even where the policy justification lags behind.

On another positive note, the Environment Act 2021 has recently been passed into law and this will, amongst many other things, from November 2023 require all planning permissions larger than householder permissions to deliver 10% biodiversity net gains (BNG) in as part of the overall development. If there is no scope to provide the relevant net gains on-site, then developers will be able to deliver off-site compensation through local habitat creation.

Again, many local authorities are not prepared to wait another 2 years for this to happen and we are encouraging our clients to deliver 10% BNG wherever possible.

For PDP, we have had an eventful year and more details can be found on the News page on our website. Particular highlights for me include the successful appeal for the extension to Denby Hall Business Park. This was a lengthy public inquiry, and we were able to demonstrate that very special circumstances did exist for development within the Green Belt, including the economic benefits of significant job creation and retention. At Ashbourne Airfield, work on the construction of the new link road is nearly complete, paving the way for the development of around 8 hectares of employment land and hundreds of new homes in phase 1 alone. Also, on the outskirts of Ashbourne, Callow Hall opened its doors again following a £7 million investment which we helped to achieve planning consent on over 2-3 years. Such has been the success of the project that it was awarded the Sunday Times Hotel of the Year for 2021.

On the subject of awards, we were thrilled to be Highly Commended in the recent RTPI East Midlands Awards for Excellence in Planning Delivery 2021 for our work on the Chase Farm scheme in Ambergate. A trio of our clients – Wildhive, Chevin Homes and Morley Hayes were also celebrating awards successes; the first venture for Wildhive, Derbyshire hotel Callow Hall was crowned the UK’s best place to stay by Sunday Times, Chevin Homes won ‘Residential Development of the Year’ at the East Midlands Business Link ‘Brick Awards’ 2021 for Chase Farm, and Morley Hayes carried away two awards at the 13th Derby Food and Drink Awards.

We can also celebrate the continued growth of the architectural team, reinforcing our ability to offer the complete service from concept to completion on a range of projects including bespoke Class Q barn conversions, city centre office-to-residential conversions and large-scale new housing schemes. The Sheffield office also continues to grow and consolidate its position within the Yorkshire region.

Looking towards 2022, lets hope for something a little more ‘normal’, whatever that means. We will continue to strive for ever more sustainable development and hope to see many of you in person over the next 12 months. I would like to wish you all a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.

Richard Pigott, Director, Planning & Design Practice Ltd

GET IN TOUCH